Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98025
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorAlexander, Jen_US
dc.creatorLi, Zen_US
dc.creatorLee, PJen_US
dc.creatorDavidson, Men_US
dc.creatorDuan, HFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T07:55:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-06T07:55:41Z-
dc.identifier.issn0733-9429en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98025-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001878.en_US
dc.titleComparison of numerical models for the interaction of a fluid transient with an offline air pocketen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume147en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001878en_US
dcterms.abstractEffective modeling of pipe network anomalies can supplement fluid transient diagnostic techniques. This study focuses on comparing modeling approaches for predicting the transient response due to air pockets entrapped outside the main flow path (offline), in particular testing the assumption that the flow inside the cavity can be predicted based on a lumped element. This assumption has been consistently made in previous modeling investigations in the time and frequency domains. The results are compared to a system frequency response model without the lumped inertia assumption by quantifying timing and signal frequency distribution errors. It is found that removing the lumped inertia assumption improved the prediction of the reflected and transmitted pulse frequency distributions by averages of 50% and 30%-35%, respectively.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of hydraulic engineering, May 2021, v. 147, no. 5, 4021014en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of hydraulic engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2021-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102349051-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-7900en_US
dc.identifier.artn4021014en_US
dc.description.validate202303 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-0349-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS46714747-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Duan_Comparison_Numerical_Models.pdfPre-Published version1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

97
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

52
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.