Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98002
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLi, Ken_US
dc.creatorYin, ZYen_US
dc.creatorHan, Den_US
dc.creatorFan, Xen_US
dc.creatorCao, Ren_US
dc.creatorLin, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T07:18:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-06T07:18:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0723-2632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98002-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02558-0.en_US
dc.subjectAnisotropyen_US
dc.subjectCompressive testen_US
dc.subjectFailure criterionen_US
dc.subjectSize effecten_US
dc.subjectTransversely isotropic rocken_US
dc.titleSize effect and anisotropy in a transversely isotropic rock under compressive conditionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage4639en_US
dc.identifier.epage4662en_US
dc.identifier.volume54en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00603-021-02558-0en_US
dcterms.abstractA series of uniaxial and triaxial compression tests were performed on slate samples with different diameters at different foliation orientations with respect to the direction of the major principal stress. The size effect and anisotropy in slate, as a transversely isotropic rock, were investigated, and the research focused on aspects of elastic properties, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), triaxial compressive strength (TCS), and triaxial residual strength (TRS). In the five elastic constants for slate, only the Young’s modulus parallel to the isotropic plane is size dependent. The UCS follows a descending size-effect model developed from coal. The size-effect behaviors of the UCS and TCS are similar. Two size-dependent failure criteria are proposed by incorporating the size-effect model for UCS into the modified Hoek–Brown and Saeidi failure criteria and are verified against experimental data. This is the first time that the relationship among the compressive strength, specimen size, foliation orientation and confining pressure has been comprehensively captured for transversely isotropic rock. Without an evident size effect, the anisotropic TRS has also been effectively captured by a modified cohesion loss model, and two bound equations for the brittleness index are finally proposed for transversely isotropic rock. This work promises to provide an upscaling method for determining the mechanical parameters of transversely isotropic rocks in practical engineering.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRock mechanics and rock engineering, Sept. 2021, v. 54, no. 9, p. 4639-4662en_US
dcterms.isPartOfRock mechanics and rock engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2021-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114062621-
dc.description.validate202303 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-0204-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNNSFC; Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Provinceen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS55596892-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Li_Size_Effect_Anisotropy.pdfPre-Published version2.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

90
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

146
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
Citations as of Dec 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

48
Citations as of Dec 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.