Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97891
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorDong, Sen_US
dc.creatorHuang, CRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T07:39:53Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-24T07:39:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn1672-9501en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97891-
dc.language.isozhen_US
dc.publisher湖北教育出版社en_US
dc.rights© 2020 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。en_US
dc.rights© 2020 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research purposes.en_US
dc.subjectHaplologyen_US
dc.subjectMandarin varietiesen_US
dc.subjectFrequencyen_US
dc.subjectTone sandhien_US
dc.subjectSyllabicityen_US
dc.titleA comparative study on haplology of Putonghua and Taiwan Mandarin and its standardisationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: 董思聪en_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: 黄居仁en_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle in Traditional Chinese: 兩岸同音刪略現像對比研究en_US
dc.identifier.spage14en_US
dc.identifier.epage24en_US
dc.identifier.volume1en_US
dcterms.abstractHaplology in Chinese nominal compounds is yielded by a set of constraints,which may function diversely across varieties or dialects.Based on empirical studies, Mandarin varieties of the mainland and Taiwan are found to be essentially the same in terms of acceptability of haplology, but differ in the overall tendency,with Taiwan Mandarin being slightly inclined to use non-haplology forms while Putonghua showing no significant preference.The two varieties also display difference in the strength rankings of three constraints.It is ‘frequency > syllabicity > tone sandhi’ in Putonghua, and ‘frequency > tone sandhi > syllabicity’in Taiwan Mandarin.Such rankings can be well explained with markedness constraints in Optimality Theory and also the theory of lexical diffusion.en_US
dcterms.abstract汉语名词性复合结构中的同音删略是否发生,具有一套制约机制。该机制的具体运作方 式在不同的共同语变体或方言中可能存在差异。根据对语言使用习惯的调查,两岸共同语在同音 删略的接受度方面表现大体一致,不过大陆普通话在是否删略方面没有显著倾向,而台湾“国语” 在整体趋势上略微倾向于不删略。此外,两岸共同语还体现出了同音删略制约条件在强弱排序上 的差异:大陆普通话为“使用频率>韵律>变调”,台湾“国语”为“使用频率>变调>韵律”。这一 强弱等级的排序以及跨语言变体的差异,可以在优选论框架中借助标记性制约条件获得解释,同 时也符合词汇扩散的语言演变模式。en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.alternative两岸同音删略现象对比研究en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitation汉语学报 (Chinese linguistics), 2020, v. 1, p. 14-24en_US
dcterms.isPartOf汉语学报 (Chinese linguistics)en_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.description.validate202303 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCBS-0136-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingText本文得到香港理工大学研究项目“Clitics as an Independent Grammatical Unit:Studies Based on Chinese Dialects”(编号:4-ZZHK),以及北京大学—香港理工大学汉语语言学研究中心的资助en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS26108791-
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dong_Comparative_Study_Haplology.pdf381.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

211
Last Week
14
Last month
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

172
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.