Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/97060
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorUy, MAen_US
dc.creatorLin, KJen_US
dc.creatorIlies, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T06:57:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-17T06:57:45Z-
dc.identifier.issn0001-4273en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/97060-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademy of Managementen_US
dc.rights© Academy of Management Journalen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted manuscript of the following article: Uy, M. A., Lin, K. J., & Ilies, R. (2017). Is it better to give or receive? The role of help in buffering the depleting effects of surface acting. Academy of management Journal, 60(4), 1442-1461, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0611.en_US
dc.subjectEmotional exhaustionen_US
dc.subjectHelpingen_US
dc.subjectModerated mediationen_US
dc.subjectSurface actingen_US
dc.subjectWork engagementen_US
dc.titleIs it better to give or receive? The role of help in buffering the depleting effects of surface actingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1442en_US
dc.identifier.epage1461en_US
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/amj.2015.0611en_US
dcterms.abstractThe resource-depleting effect of surface acting is well established. Yet we know less about the pervasiveness of this depleting effect and what employees can do at work to replenish their resources. Drawing on conservation of resources theory and the ecological congruence model, we conduct a five-day diary study among customer service representatives (CSRs) to examine the extended depleting effect of surface acting and whether social interactions with coworkers (i.e., giving and receiving help) can mitigate the negative consequences of emotional labor. Momentary reports from102 CSRs indicate that within-person daily surface acting positively predicted end-of-day emotional exhaustion, and the effect of emotional exhaustion spilled over to work engagement the following day. Analyzing the within-person moderating effects of giving and receiving help at work, we find that giving help buffered the depletion process while receiving help did not. We discuss the theoretical and practical significance of considering the temporality of the resource-depleting effects of surface acting, the role of at-work help giving in buffering the negative effect of emotional labor that could affect the sense of self, and the importance of resource congruence in influencing the efficacy of buffering effects.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAcademy of Management journal, Aug. 2017, v. 60, no. 4, p. 1442-1461en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAcademy of Management journalen_US
dcterms.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85030469085-
dc.description.validate202301 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberMM-0214-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational University of Singapore Business Schoolen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6785913-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lin_It_Better_Give.pdfPre-Published version521.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

97
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

474
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

160
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

129
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.