Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/95167
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorLo, MKen_US
dc.creatorLeung, YFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T08:32:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T08:32:30Z-
dc.identifier.issn0008-3674en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/95167-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Science Publishingen_US
dc.rightsCopyright remains with the author(s) or their institution(s). Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from RightsLink (http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/authors/services/reprints).en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the work. The final published article is available at https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0409en_US
dc.subjectBayesian updatingen_US
dc.subjectBraced excavationsen_US
dc.subjectRandom field modelingen_US
dc.subjectSoilen_US
dc.subjectSpatial variabilityen_US
dc.subjectStructure interactionen_US
dc.titleBayesian updating of subsurface spatial variability for improved prediction of braced excavation responseen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1169en_US
dc.identifier.epage1183en_US
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/cgj-2018-0409en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper introduces an approach that utilizes field measurements to update the parameters characterizing spatial variability of soil properties and model bias, leading to refined predictions for subsequent construction stages. It incorporates random field simulations and a surrogate modeling technique into the Bayesian updating framework, while the spatial and stage-dependent correlations of model bias can also be considered. The approach is illustrated using two cases of multi-stage braced excavations, one being a hypothetical scenario and the other from a case study in Hong Kong. Making use of all the deflection measurements along an inclinometer, the principal components of the random field and model bias factors can be updated efficiently as the instrumentation data become available. These various sources of uncertainty do not only cause discrepancies between prior predictions and actual performance, but can also lead to response mechanisms that cannot be captured by deterministic approaches, such as distortion of the wall along the longitudinal direction of the excavation. The proposed approach addresses these issues in an efficient manner, producing prediction intervals that reasonably encapsulate the response uncertainty as shown in the two cases. The capability to continuously refine the response estimates and prediction intervals can help support the decision-making process as the construction progresses.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCanadian geotechnical journal, Aug. 2019, v. 56, no. 8, p. 1169-1183en_US
dcterms.isPartOfCanadian geotechnical journalen_US
dcterms.issued2019-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059590993-
dc.description.validate202209 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberRGC-B2-0971, CEE-1302-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bayesian_Updating_Subsurface.pdfPre-Published version1.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

91
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

103
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

34
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.