Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116852
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering | - |
| dc.contributor | Research Centre for Nature-based Urban Infrastructure Solutions | - |
| dc.creator | Chen, Y | - |
| dc.creator | Dou, Y | - |
| dc.creator | Xu, S | - |
| dc.creator | Ka, Shun, Chan, FK | - |
| dc.creator | Chong, D | - |
| dc.creator | Chen, B | - |
| dc.creator | Wang, Y | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-21T03:53:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-21T03:53:20Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1470-160X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116852 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/ ). | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Chen, Y., Dou, Y., Xu, S., Shun Chan, F. K., Chong, D., Chen, B., & Wang, Y. (2025). Integrating NbS in compact city renewal: Preferences, constraints, and opportunities. Ecological Indicators, 178, 114003 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114003. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Compact city | en_US |
| dc.subject | Geoinformatics analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_US |
| dc.subject | Nature-based solutions | en_US |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder perceptions | en_US |
| dc.subject | Urban renewal | en_US |
| dc.title | Integrating NbS in compact city renewal : preferences, constraints, and opportunities☆ | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 178 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114003 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Compact cities, often being praised for their sustainability advantages, face significant urban challenges (UC) due to their dense configurations and the intensifying effects of climate change. This study, conducted in Hong Kong, investigates the potential of using Nature-based Solutions (NbS) to mitigate these issues through a dual methodology—integrating surveys capturing public and professional perceptions and a novel geoinformatics analysis assessing spatial opportunities. The survey engaged 233 residents and 36 experts and found that climate change ranks as a primary concern, surpassed only by housing shortages. Residents favored NbS benefits, whereas experts prioritized ecological gains like biodiversity enhancement. Both groups, however, noted potential drawbacks including risks of animal-borne diseases and nuisances. The geoinformatics analysis evaluated nine sampling areas across three regions and identified rooftop retrofitting as a key strategy for expanding NbS coverage. Vertical greening on walls and linear infrastructure also emerged as viable methods to expand NbS. With these measures, the total NbS coverage could increase from about 15–20 % to more than 30 % in the analyzed areas. By synthesizing public preferences with spatial feasibility, this study develops a comprehensive framework for NbS deployment in compact urban environments. This dual approach bridges a critical gap in conventional urban planning by ensuring solutions are both socially relevant and technically sound. | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.] | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Ecological indicators, Sept 2025, v. 178, 114003 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Ecological indicators | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2025-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105012963417 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-7034 | - |
| dc.identifier.artn | 114003 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202601 bcch | - |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_Scopus/WOS | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | This research was supported by the Chief Executive’s Policy Unit (CEPU) Public Policy Research Funding Scheme (PPRFS) (No. 2023.A6.222.23A) of Hong Kong, the Collaborative Research Fund (CRF) (No. C5033–23G) from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, and Research Centre for Nature-based Urban Infrastructure Solutions (P0053045) at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. We would also like to thank Mr. Jia Liu, Mr. Ng Kei Ching, and Mr. Ng Tsz Nok for their assistance, as well as the experts who contributed valuable insights to this research. | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S1470160X25009331-main.pdf | 27.67 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



