Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116085
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Repeatability and prognostic value of radiomic features : a study in esophageal cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Authors: Gong, J
Meng, F
Liu, C
Lu, J
Li, J
Yang, Z
Sun, H
Teng, X 
Zhang, J 
Cai, J 
Shi, M
Zhao, L
Issue Date: 2025
Source: Insights into imaging, 2025, v. 16, 166
Abstract: Objectives: To investigate whether radiomic features (RFs) repeatability and their prognostic value are study-specific.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 234 esophageal cancer (EC) patients (contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)), and 525 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (CECT). Tumor, peritumor, and lymph node regions were defined as regions of interest. RF repeatability was assessed via perturbation analysis using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with consistency and differences across cancer types, pathological regions, and modalities evaluated. The independent prognostic features common to both EC and NPC were screened from highly repeatable features using C-index and redundancy analysis.
Results: CT-based RFs in NPC and PET-based RFs in EC demonstrated significantly higher repeatability compared to CT-based RFs in EC (median ICC: 0.886 vs 0.806; 0.897 vs 0.806; p < 0.05). While CT-based peritumoral features showed comparable repeatability to tumor features in EC (0.824 vs 0.806, p > 0.05), PET-based peritumoral features exhibited significantly lower repeatability than tumor features (0.819 vs 0.897, p < 0.05). CT-based lymph node features demonstrated significantly lower repeatability than tumor features in NPC (0.863 vs 0.886, p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the effects of bin count, feature class, and filter on repeatability demonstrated consistent patterns across different cancer types, imaging modalities, and pathological regions. Moreover, four common independent prognostic features effectively stratified both EC and NPC patients into high- and low-risk groups with significant survival differences (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: RF repeatability might be affected by cancer type, pathological region, and imaging modality, while certain features maintain consistent prognostic performance across different cancer types.
Critical relevance statement: The identification of high-repeatable pan-cancer prognostic radiomics features enables noninvasive patient risk stratification to guide personalized therapy, with cross-cancer consistency enhancing their applicability and convenience in clinical practice, thereby accelerating the integration of radiomics into precision oncology clinical workflows.
Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Keywords: Esophageal cancer
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Prognosis
Radiomics
Repeatability
Publisher: SpringerOpen
Journal: Insights into imaging 
EISSN: 1869-4101
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-025-02044-z
Rights: © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The following publication Gong, J., Meng, F., Liu, C. et al. Repeatability and prognostic value of radiomic features: a study in esophageal cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Insights Imaging 16, 166 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02044-z.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s13244-025-02044-z.pdf2.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.