Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116028
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorLiang, SG-
dc.creatorChung, HY-
dc.creatorChu, KW-
dc.creatorGao, YH-
dc.creatorLau, FY-
dc.creatorLai, WI-
dc.creatorFong, GCH-
dc.creatorKwong, PWH-
dc.creatorLam, FMH-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T06:49:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-18T06:49:07Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116028-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Liang, S. G., Chung, H. Y., Chu, K. W., Gao, Y. H., Lau, F. Y., Lai, W. I., Fong, G. C.-H., Kwong, P. W.-H., & Lam, F. M. H. (2025). Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone-Based Gait Assessment in Measuring Temporal Gait Parameters: Challenges and Recommendations. Biosensors, 15(7), 397 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15070397.en_US
dc.subjectAccelerometeren_US
dc.subjectGaiten_US
dc.subjectSensoren_US
dc.subjectSmartphoneen_US
dc.subjectTemporal parametersen_US
dc.subjectWearableen_US
dc.titleValidity and reliability of a smartphone-based gait assessment in measuring temporal gait parameters : challenges and recommendationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bios15070397-
dcterms.abstractSmartphone-embedded inertia sensors are widely available nowadays. We have developed a smartphone application that could assess temporal gait characteristics using the built-in inertia measurement unit with the aim of enabling mass screening for gait abnormality. This study aimed to examine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of the smartphone-based gait assessment in assessing temporal gait parameters in level-ground walking. Twenty-six healthy young adults (mean age: 20.8 ± 0.7) were recruited. Participants walked at their comfortable pace on a 10 m pathway repetitively in two walking sessions. Gait data were simultaneously collected by the smartphone application and a VICON system during the walk. Gait events of heel strike and toes off were detected from the sensors signal by a peak detection algorithm. Further gait parameters were calculated and compared between the two systems. Pearson Product–Moment Correlation was used to evaluate the concurrent validity of both systems. Test–retest reliability was examined by the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between measurements from two sessions scheduled one to four weeks apart. The validity of smartphone-based gait assessment was moderate to excellent for parameters involving only heel strike detection (r = 0.628–0.977), poor to moderate for parameters involving detection of both heel strike and toes off (r = 0.098–0.704), and poor for the proportion of gait phases within a gait cycle. Reliability was good to fair for heel strike-related parameters (ICC = 0.845–0.388), good to moderate for heel strike and toes-off-related parameters (ICC = 0.827–0.582), and moderate to fair for proportional parameters. Validity was adversely affected when toe off was involved in the calculation, when there was an insufficient number of effective steps taken, or when calculating sub-phases with short duration. The use of smartphone-based gait assessment is recommended in calculating step time and stride time, and we suggest collecting no less than 100 steps per leg during clinical application for better validity and reliability.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBiosensors, July 2025, v. 15, no. 7, 397-
dcterms.isPartOfBiosensors-
dcterms.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105011530025-
dc.identifier.pmid40710047-
dc.identifier.eissn2079-6374-
dc.identifier.artn397-
dc.description.validate202511 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work described in the paper was partially supported by grants from the Departmental General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project No. P0042679), and the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU 25100122).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
biosensors-15-00397.pdf3.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of Nov 21, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Nov 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.