Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112363
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorJafarzadeh, A-
dc.creatorKhashei-Siuki, A-
dc.creatorPourreza-Bilondi, M-
dc.creatorChau, KW-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T00:50:53Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-09T00:50:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn2090-4479-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112363-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Engineering, Ain Shams Universityen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Jafarzadeh, A., Khashei-Siuki, A., Pourreza-Bilondi, M., & Chau, K.-w. (2024). Integrating of Bayesian model averaging and formal likelihood function to enhance groundwater process modeling in arid environments. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(12), 103127 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.103127.en_US
dc.subjectEnsemble Groundwater Modelingen_US
dc.subjectHeteroscedasticityen_US
dc.subjectMesh Lessen_US
dc.subjectResidual Error Assumptionsen_US
dc.titleIntegrating of Bayesian model averaging and formal likelihood function to enhance groundwater process modeling in arid environmentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asej.2024.103127-
dcterms.abstractPredictive uncertainty has influenced by traditional assumptions about the residual error. This study attempts to perform an uncertainty analysis of ensemble groundwater modeling through Bayesian Model Averaging- BMA in conditions that these assumptions are violated. This study hired a framework accompanied by BMA to generate an anticipative inference of numerical groundwater contents with non-stationary, dependent, and non‐Gaussian errors. Groundwater levels were numerically simulated using three different methods for an arid aquifer in Iran. Subsequently, the BMA approach generated an improved estimate of groundwater levels by incorporating various likelihood contexts (i.e., formal and informal) to address assumptions related to residual errors. Results showed that the formal likelihood function deals with residual assumptions well, primarily for stationary and normality. Additionally, the results of the uncertainty analysis revealed that the formal function-based BMA outperforms the informal function-based BMA. Furthermore, the final predictions generated by the formal function-based BMA are comparable to the outputs of the Mesh free method in terms of RMSE.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAin Shams engineering journal, Dec. 2024, v. 15, no. 12, 103127-
dcterms.isPartOfAin Shams engineering journal-
dcterms.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207734284-
dc.identifier.eissn2090-4495-
dc.identifier.artn103127-
dc.description.validate202504 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2090447924005082-main.pdf16.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

4
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.