Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/111608
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Mathematicsen_US
dc.creatorShi, Xen_US
dc.creatorXu, ZQen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T08:36:51Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-03T08:36:51Z-
dc.identifier.issn0167-6911en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/111608-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the preprint version of the following article: Shi, X., & Xu, Z. Q. (2024). Constrained monotone mean–variance investment-reinsurance under the Cramér–Lundberg model with random coefficients. Systems & Control Letters, 188, 105796, which is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105796.en_US
dc.subjectBSDE with jumpsen_US
dc.subjectCone constraintsen_US
dc.subjectMonotone mean–varianceen_US
dc.subjectRandom coefficientsen_US
dc.subjectThe Cramér–Lundberg modelen_US
dc.titleConstrained monotone mean-variance investment-reinsurance under the Cramér-Lundberg model with random coefficientsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume188en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105796en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper studies an optimal investment-reinsurance problem for an insurer (she) under the Cramér–Lundberg model with monotone mean–variance (MMV) criterion. At any time, the insurer can purchase reinsurance (or acquire new business) and invest in a security market consisting of a risk-free asset and multiple risky assets whose excess return rate and volatility rate are allowed to be random. The trading strategy is subject to a general convex cone constraint, encompassing no-shorting constraint as a special case. The optimal investment-reinsurance strategy and optimal value for the MMV problem are deduced by solving certain backward stochastic differential equations with jumps. In the literature, it is known that models with MMV criterion and mean–variance criterion lead to the same optimal strategy and optimal value when the wealth process is continuous. Our result shows that the conclusion remains true even if the wealth process has compensated Poisson jumps and the market coefficients are random.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSystems and control letters, June 2024, v. 188, 105796en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSystems and control lettersen_US
dcterms.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190269070-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7956en_US
dc.identifier.artn105796en_US
dc.description.validate202503 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAuthor’s Originalen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3419c-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50087-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AO)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Shi_Constrained_Monotone_Mean–variance.pdfPreprint version860.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Author’s Original
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

11
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

6
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.