Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/109394
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorGu, Sen_US
dc.creatorWen, CYen_US
dc.creatorHao, Jen_US
dc.creatorWang, Wen_US
dc.creatorWang, Qen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T01:43:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-16T01:43:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-1120en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/109394-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectLaminar reacting flowsen_US
dc.titleThe influence of hypersonic free-stream conicity on the flow over a sphereen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume989en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/jfm.2024.489en_US
dcterms.abstractThe influence of free-stream conicity on the various aspects of the flow over a spherical test model is examined using both analytical and numerical methods. For the analytical method, a simple closed-form analytical model is assembled. Six different free-stream conditions with different Mach numbers, Reynolds numbers and thermochemistry are tested at four different degrees of conicity corresponding to those which can realistically be encountered in experiments. It is found that the results around the stagnation point are mostly insensitive to the flow condition and gas type, except for some mild non-equilibrium effects, and excellent agreement between the analytical and numerical results exists. The shock stand-off distance on the stagnation streamline is shown to decrease with increasing conicity. This decrease increases the tangential velocity gradient at the stagnation point, increasing the stagnation point heat flux and decreasing the stagnation point boundary layer thickness. The free-stream conicity is also found to alter the normalized distributions of the shock stand-off distance, heat flux, surface pressure and boundary layer thickness with the angle from the stagnation point. In general, increasing the conicity magnifies the slope of these distributions. Regarding the boundary layer transition, it is found that, if it occurs in a uniform free stream, it would also occur in a conical free stream, albeit with the transition point shifted upstream closer to the stagnation point due to the increase in the boundary layer edge tangential velocity. Overall, considering the relevant experimental uncertainties, corrections for free-stream conicity are generally recommended when larger test models are used.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of fluid mechanics, 25 June 2024, v. 989, A10en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of fluid mechanicsen_US
dcterms.issued2024-06-25-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-7645en_US
dc.identifier.artnA10en_US
dc.description.validate202410 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3228-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49808-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2024-12-25en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2024-12-25
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

35
Citations as of Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.