Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108336
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorWang, Jen_US
dc.creatorWang, LLen_US
dc.creatorYou, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T01:56:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-08T01:56:30Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108336-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.rights© 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2023. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, J., Wang, L., & You, R. (2023). Evaluating a combined WRF and CityFFD method for calculating urban wind distributions. Building and Environment, 234, 110205 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110205.en_US
dc.subjectFast fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectMultiscaleen_US
dc.subjectPower-law wind profileen_US
dc.subjectUrban wind distributionen_US
dc.subjectWeather research and forecastingen_US
dc.titleEvaluating a combined WRF and CityFFD method for calculating urban wind distributionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume234en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110205en_US
dcterms.abstractInflow boundary conditions are critical for simulating urban wind fields by CFD methods, and wind profiles within the atmospheric boundary layer are significantly affected by local atmosphere circulation and diurnal variation. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is a powerful mesoscale weather prediction model that can be used to provide more realistic inflow boundary conditions. To investigate the potential of a combined WRF and CityFFD method (WRF-CityFFD), this study first validated the WRF and CityFFD models and then used the validated models in WRF-CityFFD to calculate the wind distribution in the Kowloon district of Hong Kong within an area of 3.5 km × 2.4 km. The wind speed data at two weather stations were used as a benchmark, and CityFFD with inflow boundary conditions from a semi-empirical method (semi-empirical-CityFFD) was also investigated for comparison. The WRF-CityFFD performed better than the semi-empirical-CityFFD in calculating wind velocities in urban microclimates. The power-law exponent for wind profiles should be carefully defined when conducting CFD simulations for complex urban layouts. Coastal areas with onshore wind conditions were more suitable for selection as inflow boundary conditions for WRF-CityFFD.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding and environment, 15 Apr. 2023, v. 234, 110205en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2023-04-15-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn110205en_US
dc.description.validate202408 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3122-
dc.identifier.SubFormID49662-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Evaluating_Combined_WRF.pdfPre-Published version3.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

46
Citations as of Apr 13, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
Citations as of Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.