Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107747
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: English prosodic focus marking by Cantonese trilingual children with and without autism spectrum disorder
Authors: Wang, BX 
Chen, S 
Zhou, F 
Liu, J 
Xiao, C 
Chan, A 
Tang, T 
Issue Date: Mar-2024
Source: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, Mar. 2024, v. 67, no. 3, p. 782-801
Abstract: Purpose: The current study investigated English prosodic focus marking by autistic and typically developing (TD) Cantonese trilingual children, and examined the potential differences in this regard compared to native English-speaking children.
Method: Forty-eight participants were recruited with 16 speakers for each of the three groups (Cantonese-speaking autistic [CASD], Cantonese-speaking TD [CTD], and English-speaking TD [ETD] children), and prompt questions were designed to elicit desired focus type (i.e., broad, narrow, and contrastive focus). Mean duration, mean fundamental frequency (F0), F0 range, mean intensity, and F0 curves were used as the acoustic correlates for linear mixed-effects model fitting and functional data analyses in relation to groups and focus conditions (i.e., broad, narrow, and contrastive pre-, on-, and post-focus).
Results: The CTD group had post-focus compression (PFC) patterns via reducing mean duration, narrowing F0 range, and lowering mean F0, F0 curve, and mean intensity for words under both narrow and contrastive post-focus conditions, while the CASD group only had shortened mean duration and lowered F0 curves. However, neither the CTD group nor CASD group showed much of on-focus expansion (OFE) patterns. The ETD group marked OFE by increasing mean duration, mean F0, mean intensity, and higher F0 curve for words under on-focus conditions.
Conclusions: The CTD group utilized more acoustic cues than the CASD group when it comes to PFC. The ETD group differed from the CASD and CTD groups in the use of OFE. Furthermore, both the CASD and CTD groups showed positive first language transfer in the use of duration and intensity and, potentially, successful acquisition in the use of F0 for prosodic focus marking. Meanwhile, the differences in the use of OFE between the Cantonese-speaking and English-speaking groups, not PFC, might indicate that Cantonese-speaking children acquire PFC prior to OFE.
Publisher: American Speech - Language - Hearing Association
Journal: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research 
ISSN: 1092-4388
EISSN: 1558-9102
DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00508
Rights: This is the accepted version of the following article: Wang Bruce, X., Chen, S., Zhou, F., Liu, J., Xiao, C., Chan, A., & Tang, T. (2024). English Prosodic Focus Marking by Cantonese Trilingual Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 67(3), 782-801 which has been published in https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00508.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_English_Prosodic_Focus.pdfPre-Published version1.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

85
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

104
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.