Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105084
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: A comparison of traditional and 3D scanning measurement in ear anthropometry
Authors: Fu, F 
Luximon, A
Luximon, Y 
Issue Date: 2019
Source: Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 2019, v. 967, p. 417-423
Abstract: Ear anthropometry is important in physical ergonomics for ear-related products. With various anthropometric methods, comparisons between different measuring techniques have not been sufficiently studied especially for ear dimensions. This study aimed at comparing traditional measurement and 3D scanning method for ear anthropometry, with addressing their usages in practice. For thirty participants, ear length and ear width were measured by the same investigator with two measuring methods. Traditional measurement was directly conducted with a caliper, whereas dimensions using 3D scanning technique were extracted from the point cloud acquired from a structured light scanner. Statistical results showed the differences between traditional and 3D scanning measurement, which can provide empirical evidences of differences between different measuring techniques for ear anthropometry. Additionally, the usages of different methods were discussed so that the proper method can be selected to match specific goals for future research.
Keywords: Anthropometry
Comparison
Ear measurement
Publisher: Springer
Journal: Advances in intelligent systems and computing 
ISBN: 978-3-030-20141-8 (Softcover)
978-3-030-20142-5 (eBook)
ISSN: 2194-5357
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42
Description: AHFE 2019 International Conference on Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, July 24-28, 2019, Washington D.C., USA
Rights: © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
This version of the proceeding paper has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42.
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fu_Comparison_Traditional_3D.pdfPre-Published version228.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

78
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

59
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.