Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105084
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | School of Design | - |
| dc.creator | Fu, F | - |
| dc.creator | Luximon, A | - |
| dc.creator | Luximon, Y | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-03T01:46:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-03T01:46:09Z | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-030-20141-8 (Softcover) | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-030-20142-5 (eBook) | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2194-5357 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105084 | - |
| dc.description | AHFE 2019 International Conference on Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, July 24-28, 2019, Washington D.C., USA | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.rights | © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 | en_US |
| dc.rights | This version of the proceeding paper has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Anthropometry | en_US |
| dc.subject | Comparison | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ear measurement | en_US |
| dc.title | A comparison of traditional and 3D scanning measurement in ear anthropometry | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 417 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 423 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 967 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42 | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Ear anthropometry is important in physical ergonomics for ear-related products. With various anthropometric methods, comparisons between different measuring techniques have not been sufficiently studied especially for ear dimensions. This study aimed at comparing traditional measurement and 3D scanning method for ear anthropometry, with addressing their usages in practice. For thirty participants, ear length and ear width were measured by the same investigator with two measuring methods. Traditional measurement was directly conducted with a caliper, whereas dimensions using 3D scanning technique were extracted from the point cloud acquired from a structured light scanner. Statistical results showed the differences between traditional and 3D scanning measurement, which can provide empirical evidences of differences between different measuring techniques for ear anthropometry. Additionally, the usages of different methods were discussed so that the proper method can be selected to match specific goals for future research. | - |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 2019, v. 967, p. 417-423 | - |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Advances in intelligent systems and computing | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2019 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85067253806 | - |
| dc.relation.conference | International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics [AHFE] | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202403 bckw | - |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | SD-0144 | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 20431248 | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Conference Paper | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fu_Comparison_Traditional_3D.pdf | Pre-Published version | 228.72 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
78
Last Week
3
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
Downloads
59
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



