Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105084
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Design-
dc.creatorFu, F-
dc.creatorLuximon, A-
dc.creatorLuximon, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T01:46:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-03T01:46:09Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-20141-8 (Softcover)-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-20142-5 (eBook)-
dc.identifier.issn2194-5357-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105084-
dc.descriptionAHFE 2019 International Conference on Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, July 24-28, 2019, Washington D.C., USAen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the proceeding paper has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42.en_US
dc.subjectAnthropometryen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectEar measurementen_US
dc.titleA comparison of traditional and 3D scanning measurement in ear anthropometryen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage417-
dc.identifier.epage423-
dc.identifier.volume967-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_42-
dcterms.abstractEar anthropometry is important in physical ergonomics for ear-related products. With various anthropometric methods, comparisons between different measuring techniques have not been sufficiently studied especially for ear dimensions. This study aimed at comparing traditional measurement and 3D scanning method for ear anthropometry, with addressing their usages in practice. For thirty participants, ear length and ear width were measured by the same investigator with two measuring methods. Traditional measurement was directly conducted with a caliper, whereas dimensions using 3D scanning technique were extracted from the point cloud acquired from a structured light scanner. Statistical results showed the differences between traditional and 3D scanning measurement, which can provide empirical evidences of differences between different measuring techniques for ear anthropometry. Additionally, the usages of different methods were discussed so that the proper method can be selected to match specific goals for future research.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAdvances in intelligent systems and computing, 2019, v. 967, p. 417-423-
dcterms.isPartOfAdvances in intelligent systems and computing-
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067253806-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics [AHFE]-
dc.description.validate202403 bckw-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberSD-0144en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS20431248en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fu_Comparison_Traditional_3D.pdfPre-Published version228.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

78
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

59
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.