Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103490
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Environmental impact assessment in Hong Kong : a comparison study and lessons learnt
Authors: Tang, L
Fan, L 
Ni, M 
Shen, L
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Impact assessment and project appraisal, 2016, v. 34, no. 3, p. 254-260
Abstract: Although many studies in developed countries on the practice of EIA have been conducted, there is a lack of similar attention in Hong Kong. This gap in knowledge is addressed in this study which summarises and records the current practice and lessons learned from priority projects. In the case of Hong Kong, this lack of understanding is important, since a significant number of infrastructure projects with applications pending for environmental approvals were delayed, awaiting the court ruling of the judicial review. In this research, the EIA system and practices in Hong Kong were comprehensively reviewed by a comparison study between Hong Kong, Mainland China, Taiwan and Singapore. Then field work of interviews with professionals and focus group meetings with Green Groups were conducted to seek opinions of interviewees and members about the mechanism of EIA. Recommendations on aspects of EIA systems are provided at the end of the paper.
Keywords: Comparison study
Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
Environmental impact system
Hong Kong
Mainland China
Singapore
Taiwan
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Journal: Impact assessment and project appraisal 
ISSN: 1461-5517
EISSN: 1471-5465
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1177934
Rights: © 2016 IAIA
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal on 07 Jun 2016 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14615517.2016.1177934.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ni_Environmental_Impact_Assessment.pdfPre-Published version2.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

107
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

156
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Jun 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.