Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103490
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorTang, Len_US
dc.creatorFan, Len_US
dc.creatorNi, Men_US
dc.creatorShen, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:34:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:34:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn1461-5517en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103490-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2016 IAIAen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal on 07 Jun 2016 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14615517.2016.1177934.en_US
dc.subjectComparison studyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact assessment (EIA)en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact systemen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectMainland Chinaen_US
dc.subjectSingaporeen_US
dc.subjectTaiwanen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental impact assessment in Hong Kong : a comparison study and lessons learnten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationTitle on author's file: Environmental impact assessment in Hong Kong: practice review and recommendationsen_US
dc.identifier.spage254en_US
dc.identifier.epage260en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14615517.2016.1177934en_US
dcterms.abstractAlthough many studies in developed countries on the practice of EIA have been conducted, there is a lack of similar attention in Hong Kong. This gap in knowledge is addressed in this study which summarises and records the current practice and lessons learned from priority projects. In the case of Hong Kong, this lack of understanding is important, since a significant number of infrastructure projects with applications pending for environmental approvals were delayed, awaiting the court ruling of the judicial review. In this research, the EIA system and practices in Hong Kong were comprehensively reviewed by a comparison study between Hong Kong, Mainland China, Taiwan and Singapore. Then field work of interviews with professionals and focus group meetings with Green Groups were conducted to seek opinions of interviewees and members about the mechanism of EIA. Recommendations on aspects of EIA systems are provided at the end of the paper.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationImpact assessment and project appraisal, 2016, v. 34, no. 3, p. 254-260en_US
dcterms.isPartOfImpact assessment and project appraisalen_US
dcterms.issued2016-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84976271847-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-5465en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-1086-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Construction Association, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6653816-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ni_Environmental_Impact_Assessment.pdfPre-Published version2.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

107
Citations as of May 11, 2025

Downloads

156
Citations as of May 11, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Jun 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.