Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103490
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | en_US |
dc.creator | Tang, L | en_US |
dc.creator | Fan, L | en_US |
dc.creator | Ni, M | en_US |
dc.creator | Shen, L | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-11T00:34:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-11T00:34:20Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1461-5517 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103490 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2016 IAIA | en_US |
dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal on 07 Jun 2016 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14615517.2016.1177934. | en_US |
dc.subject | Comparison study | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental impact assessment (EIA) | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental impact system | en_US |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject | Mainland China | en_US |
dc.subject | Singapore | en_US |
dc.subject | Taiwan | en_US |
dc.title | Environmental impact assessment in Hong Kong : a comparison study and lessons learnt | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Title on author's file: Environmental impact assessment in Hong Kong: practice review and recommendations | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 254 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 260 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14615517.2016.1177934 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Although many studies in developed countries on the practice of EIA have been conducted, there is a lack of similar attention in Hong Kong. This gap in knowledge is addressed in this study which summarises and records the current practice and lessons learned from priority projects. In the case of Hong Kong, this lack of understanding is important, since a significant number of infrastructure projects with applications pending for environmental approvals were delayed, awaiting the court ruling of the judicial review. In this research, the EIA system and practices in Hong Kong were comprehensively reviewed by a comparison study between Hong Kong, Mainland China, Taiwan and Singapore. Then field work of interviews with professionals and focus group meetings with Green Groups were conducted to seek opinions of interviewees and members about the mechanism of EIA. Recommendations on aspects of EIA systems are provided at the end of the paper. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Impact assessment and project appraisal, 2016, v. 34, no. 3, p. 254-260 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Impact assessment and project appraisal | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84976271847 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-5465 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202312 bcch | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | BRE-1086 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
dc.description.fundingText | Hong Kong Construction Association, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.identifier.OPUS | 6653816 | - |
dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ni_Environmental_Impact_Assessment.pdf | Pre-Published version | 2.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
107
Citations as of May 11, 2025
Downloads
156
Citations as of May 11, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
Citations as of Jun 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
Citations as of Jun 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.