Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103172
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorAbbas, Aen_US
dc.creatorSeo, Jen_US
dc.creatorKim, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T00:32:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T00:32:07Z-
dc.identifier.issn0887-3801en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/103172-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.rightsThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000931.en_US
dc.subjectCognitive behavior and performanceen_US
dc.subjectCognitive loaden_US
dc.subjectMobile augmented realityen_US
dc.subjectRebar inspectionen_US
dc.subjectSituational awarenessen_US
dc.titleImpact of mobile augmented reality system on cognitive behavior and performance during rebar inspection tasksen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage12en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000931en_US
dcterms.abstractMobile augmented reality (MAR) enhances the real world through the superimposition of computer-generated information while not interfering with a users’ mobility, having great potential to support various construction tasks. However, such information may lead to cognitive overload and, thus, could lead to adverse effects on the performance of tasks. Also, the narrowing of a user’s field of view that comes with MAR use could limit his or her ability to notice events in their surroundings. Therefore, it is important to understand how MAR use affects cognitive behavior, as well as task and safety performance for better design and applications of MAR in construction. As a preliminary investigation, this study conducted laboratory simulations of rebar-inspection tasks and compared the cognitive load (CL), task performance (TP), and situational awareness (SA) of users of two types of MAR systems—i.e., head-mounted and handheld—against those of inspectors using traditional paper-based methods. In particular, participants’ CL was measured with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), their TP by completion time and the number of rebars correctly detected, and their SA with Taylor’s Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART). Based on the results, we discuss the impact of the MAR system on rebar-inspection tasks from both cognitive and safety perspectives.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of computing in civil engineering, Nov. 2020, v. 34, no. 6, 04020050, p. 1-12en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of computing in civil engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090786574-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-5487en_US
dc.identifier.artn04020050en_US
dc.description.validate202312 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBRE-0235-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextStart-up Fund project, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; Technology Advancement Research Program, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of the Korean governmenten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS48342608-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abbas_Impact_Mobile_Augmented.pdfPre-Published version934.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

108
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

142
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

42
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.