Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102917
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorDai, Yen_US
dc.creatorMak, CMen_US
dc.creatorAi, Zen_US
dc.creatorHang, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:58:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:58:37Z-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102917-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Dai, Y., Mak, C. M., Ai, Z., & Hang, J. (2018). Evaluation of computational and physical parameters influencing CFD simulations of pollutant dispersion in building arrays. Building and Environment, 137, 90-107 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.005.en_US
dc.subjectBuilding arraysen_US
dc.subjectCFD simulationen_US
dc.subjectComputational parametersen_US
dc.subjectPollutant dispersionen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity testen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of computational and physical parameters influencing CFD simulations of pollutant dispersion in building arraysen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage90en_US
dc.identifier.epage107en_US
dc.identifier.volume137en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.005en_US
dcterms.abstractMany CFD studies have investigated the influence of computational parameters on the predicted concentration distribution of pollutants around isolated buildings, but such studies for building arrays are still lacking. This study systematically evaluated the influence of four computational and two physical parameters on pollutant dispersion in building arrays, including turbulence models, grid resolution, discretization of time step size Δt, length of sampling period, aspect ratio of the arrays, and release rate of tracer gas. Throughout these evaluations, a set of published wind tunnel experimental data was used to validate the CFD models. For concentration simulations, the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model gave the most accurate results but still had limitations in areas near the source, whereas the Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Strokes (RANS) RNG k−ε models underperformed in some areas. The results of the LES and DES simulations varied with changes in Δt∗ and sampling length until Δt∗ was less than 0.24 and the sampling length was higher than 2400 Δt∗ for LES and 1200 Δt∗ for DES. A larger aspect ratio did not necessarily result in a higher concentration field than a smaller ratio. An increase in the tracer gas release rate did not change the general dispersion characteristics, but it still affected the concentration distribution in the areas near the source and resulted in a larger polluted area. The findings of this study are intended to contribute to improvements in the quality of CFD simulations of pollutant dispersion in building arrays.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding and environment, June 2018, v. 137, p. 90-107en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding and environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85045537807-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684Xen_US
dc.description.validate202310 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0490-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6834990-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dai_Evaluation_Computational_Physical.pdfPre-Published version2.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

114
Last Week
16
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

91
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

81
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

78
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.