Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102904
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorFang, Zen_US
dc.creatorFeng, Xen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Jen_US
dc.creatorLin, Zen_US
dc.creatorMak, CMen_US
dc.creatorNiu, Jen_US
dc.creatorTse, KTen_US
dc.creatorXu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T02:58:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T02:58:32Z-
dc.identifier.issn2210-6707en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/102904-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Fang, Z., Feng, X., Liu, J., Lin, Z., Mak, C. M., Niu, J., . . . Xu, X. (2019). Investigation into the differences among several outdoor thermal comfort indices against field survey in subtropics. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 676-690 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.022.en_US
dc.subjectMicroclimatic parametersen_US
dc.subjectOperative temperatureen_US
dc.subjectOutdoor thermal comforten_US
dc.subjectThermal comfort indicesen_US
dc.subjectThermal sensationen_US
dc.titleInvestigation into the differences among several outdoor thermal comfort indices against field survey in subtropicsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage676en_US
dc.identifier.epage690en_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.022en_US
dcterms.abstractComfortable and healthy outdoor microclimates are beneficial to sustainable urban development. Based on a comprehensive comparison of some currently frequently used thermal comfort indices, including PMV, WBGT, PET, SET*, and UTCI, the differences among these indices are significant in dealing with the fundamental energy balance model, descriptive equations, and application boundary conditions. In order to validate these indices, a subjective questionnaire survey with field measurements was carried out on a university campus in Guangzhou in southern China. Results revealed strong linear relationships between operative temperature and mean radiant temperature (Tmrt), WBGT, PET, SET*, UTCI, as well as PMV. However, the relationships between these thermal comfort indices and the mean thermal sensation vote (MTSV) are not clear for a hot outdoor environment, especially when the operative temperature was above 34 °C. The ranges of the heat stress category and PMV need to be modified for the evaluation of hot outdoor environments.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable cities and society, Jan. 2019, v. 44, p. 676-690en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable cities and societyen_US
dcterms.issued2019-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056574465-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-6715en_US
dc.description.validate202311 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBEEE-0421-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS27465746-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mak_Investigation_Differences_Outdoor.pdfPre-Published version1.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

116
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

214
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

194
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

181
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.