Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101204
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorBababeik, Men_US
dc.creatorKhademi, Nen_US
dc.creatorChen, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T04:15:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-30T04:15:50Z-
dc.identifier.issn1366-5545en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/101204-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Bababeik, M., Khademi, N., & Chen, A. (2018). Increasing the resilience level of a vulnerable rail network: The strategy of location and allocation of emergency relief trains. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 119, 110-128 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.09.009.en_US
dc.subjectCooperative coverageen_US
dc.subjectLocation and allocation modelen_US
dc.subjectRailway systemsen_US
dc.subjectRelief trainsen_US
dc.subjectResilienceen_US
dc.subjectVulnerabilityen_US
dc.titleIncreasing the resilience level of a vulnerable rail network : the strategy of location and allocation of emergency relief trainsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage110en_US
dc.identifier.epage128en_US
dc.identifier.volume119en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tre.2018.09.009en_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper examines the optimal location and allocation of relief trains (RTs) to enhance the resilience level of the rail network. Unlike probabilistic approaches, the priority of demand is handled by link exposure measure which considers the operational attributes of links and accessibility to road system. We formulate the proposed model using a bi-objective programming and solve it using an augmented e-constraint method (AUGMECON) combined with a fuzzy-logic approach. The proposed framework is employed to a real-world case study, and analytical results reveal the superiority of the proposed model in providing an economical and effective layout compared to conventional maximal covering model.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation review, Nov. 2018, v. 119, p. 110-128en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part E, Logistics and transportation reviewen_US
dcterms.issued2018-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054769654-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-5794en_US
dc.description.validate202308 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberCEE-1652-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS20010176-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chen_Increasing_Resilience_Level.pdfPre-Published version1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

69
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

51
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

73
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

48
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.