Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90389
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Are word embeddings really a bad fit for the estimation of thematic fit?
Authors: Chersoni, E 
Pannitto, L
Santus, E
Lenci, A
Huang, CR 
Issue Date: 2020
Source: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), Marseille, France, May 2020, p. 5708-5713
Abstract: While neural embeddings represent a popular choice for word representation in a wide variety of NLP tasks, their usage for thematic fit modeling has been limited, as they have been reported to lag behind syntax-based count models. In this paper, we propose a complete evaluation of count models and word embeddings on thematic fit estimation, by taking into account a larger number of parameters and verb roles and introducing also dependency-based embeddings in the comparison. Our results show a complex scenario, where a determinant factor for the performance seems to be the availability to the model of reliable syntactic information for building the distributional representations of the roles.
Keywords: Semantics
Cognitive methods
Statistical and machine learning methods
Rights: © European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
The following publication Chersoni, E., Pannitto, L., Santus, E., Lenci, A., & Huang, C. R. (2020, May). Are Word Embeddings Really a Bad Fit for the Estimation of Thematic Fit?. In Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 5708-5713) is available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.lrec-1.700
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020.lrec-1.700.pdf711.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

104
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

21
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.