Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93937
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorYan, Ren_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorFagerholt, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-03T08:48:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-03T08:48:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn0308-8839en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93937-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Maritime policy and management on 9 May 2021 (Published online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03088839.2021.1903599.en_US
dc.subjectCoordinated strategiesen_US
dc.subjectInspection efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectMaritime safetyen_US
dc.subjectPort state control (PSC)en_US
dc.subjectShip deficiencyen_US
dc.titleCoordinated approaches for port state control inspection planningen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage897en_US
dc.identifier.epage912en_US
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2021.1903599en_US
dcterms.abstractPort state control (PSC) inspections serve to guard maritime safety and the marine environment. Because port inspection resources are limited, inspection efficiency can be improved if the resources are scheduled more efficiently. Currently, ports worldwide apply a greedy inspection strategy. To improve inspection efficiency, this study proposes two coordinated inspection strategies for both liner and tramp ships, i.e., a self-coordinated port strategy and a fully coordinated central agent strategy. Extensive numerical experiments indicate that on average the self-coordinated port strategy performs 2.48% better than the greedy strategy, and the fully coordinated strategy outperforms the greedy and self-coordinated port strategies by 5.02% and 2.48%, respectively. The superiority of the two coordinated strategies is robust to different ratios of liner to tramp ships visiting the ports from 0/100 to 100/0. Therefore, the feasibility and wide applicability of the proposed coordinated strategies are validated. Specifically, when liner ships outnumber tramp ships, the fully coordinated strategy is more suitable; otherwise, both the self-coordinated port strategy and the fully coordinated strategy can be used.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMaritime policy and management, 2022, v. 49, no. 6, p. 897-912en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMaritime policy and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105892144-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5254en_US
dc.description.validate202208 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0063-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPolicy Innovation and Co-ordination Office (PICO) of the Government of the HKSAR; National Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS54000829-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yan_Coordinated_Approaches_Port.pdfPre-Published version428.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

44
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

48
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.