Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93544
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informaticsen_US
dc.creatorLuo, TXHen_US
dc.creatorLai, WWLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T01:03:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-08T01:03:01Z-
dc.identifier.issn0886-7798en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93544-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Luo, T. X., & Lai, W. W. (2020). GPR pattern recognition of shallow subsurface air voids. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 99, 103355 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103355en_US
dc.subjectGround penetrating radaren_US
dc.subjectPattern recognitionen_US
dc.subjectPyramid methoden_US
dc.subjectSubsurface air voiden_US
dc.titleGPR pattern recognition of shallow subsurface air voidsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume99en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tust.2020.103355en_US
dcterms.abstractCountless subsurface voids in urban areas of cities threaten people's lives and property. A workflow for automatically identifying subsurface voids from ground penetrating radar (GPR) data was developed in this study. The workflow consists of 3 stages: locating voids automatically from C-scans, then verifying voids from corresponding B-scans, and finally making judgements based upon the previous 2 sets of results. This study adopted 2 (Lai et al., 2016) approaches: approach 1 quantified the GPR response of air voids using forward modelling, while approach 2 used workflow prototyping and validation with inverse modelling. Forward simulations indicated that different ratios of void size to GPR signal footprint could result in a variety of patterns in B-scans: they can be hyperbolas, cross patterns, bowl shaped patterns and reverberations. With a database of void patterns of both C-scans and B-scans established, in approach 2 the workflow uses a pyramid pattern recognition method – with pixel value or gradient being used for feature identification – to search automatically for air-filled void responses in GPR data. The workflow was tested using 2 laboratory and field experiments and the results were promising. The constraint values proposed by the 2 experiments were validated with another site experiment. Given the huge workload involved in city-scale subsurface health inspections, a standardized workflow can help improve efficiency and effectiveness of subsurface void identification.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTunnelling and underground space technology, May 2020, v. 99, 103355en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTunnelling and underground space technologyen_US
dcterms.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85080061312-
dc.identifier.artn103355en_US
dc.description.validate202207 bcfcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLSGI-0107-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS29143270-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Luo_GPR_Pattern_Recognition.pdfPre-Published version2.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

53
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

159
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

34
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.