Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90619
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics | en_US |
dc.creator | Zhou, J | en_US |
dc.creator | Chen, J | en_US |
dc.creator | Chen, X | en_US |
dc.creator | Zhu, X | en_US |
dc.creator | Qiu, Y | en_US |
dc.creator | Song, H | en_US |
dc.creator | Rao, Y | en_US |
dc.creator | Zhang, C | en_US |
dc.creator | Cao, X | en_US |
dc.creator | Cui, X | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-04T01:52:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-04T01:52:13Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-4257 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/90619 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Zhou, J., Chen, J., Chen, X., Zhu, X., Qiu, Y., Song, H., Rao, Y., Zhang, C., Cao, X., & Cui, X. (2021). Sensitivity of six typical spatiotemporal fusion methods to different influential factors: A comparative study for a normalized difference vegetation index time series reconstruction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 252, 112130 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112130. | en_US |
dc.subject | Geometric misregistration | en_US |
dc.subject | Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiometric inconsistency | en_US |
dc.subject | Spatial resolution ratio | en_US |
dc.subject | Spatiotemporal fusion | en_US |
dc.title | Sensitivity of six typical spatiotemporal fusion methods to different influential factors : a comparative study for a normalized difference vegetation index time series reconstruction | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 252 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112130 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Dozens of spatiotemporal fusion methods have been developed to reconstruct vegetation index time-series data with both high spatial resolution and frequent coverage for monitoring land surface dynamics. Although several studies comparing the different fusion methods have been conducted, selecting the suitable fusion methods is still challenging, as inevitable influential factors tend to be neglected. To address this problem, this study compared six typical spatiotemporal fusion methods, including the Unmixing-Based Data Fusion (UBDF), Linear Mixing Growth Model (LMGM), Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM), Fit-FC (regression model Fitting, spatial Filtering and residual Compensation), One Pair Dictionary-Learning method (OPDL), and Flexible Spatiotemporal DAta Fusion (FSDAF), based on simulation experiments and theoretical analysis considering three influential factors between sensors: geometric misregistration, radiometric inconsistency, and spatial resolution ratio. The results indicate that Fit-FC achieved the best performance with the strongest tolerance to geometric misregistration when radiometric inconsistency was negligible; thus, it is the first recommended algorithm for blending normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) imagery. Instead, the FSDAF could generate the best results if radiometric inconsistency was non-negligible. These findings could help users determine the method that is appropriate for different remote sensing datasets, and provide guidelines for developers in the future development of novel methods. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Remote sensing of environment, Jan. 2021, v. 252, 112130 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Remote sensing of environment | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2021-01 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85094323377 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-0704 | en_US |
dc.identifier.artn | 112130 | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202108 bcvc | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a0993-n05 | - |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 2332 | - |
dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zhou_Sensitivity_Six_Typical_.pdf | Pre-Published version | 4.44 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
114
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of May 5, 2024
Downloads
169
Citations as of May 5, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
91
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
77
Citations as of May 2, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.