Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/81216
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorYu, ZX-
dc.creatorZhao, L-
dc.creatorGuo, LP-
dc.creatorLiu, YP-
dc.creatorYang, C-
dc.creatorZhao, SC-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T08:29:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-23T08:29:47Z-
dc.identifier.issn1070-9622en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/81216-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 Z. X. Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yu, Z. X., Zhao, L., Guo, L. P., Liu, Y. P., Yang, C., & Zhao, S. C. (2019). Full-Scale Impact Test and Numerical Simulation of a New-Type Resilient Rock-Shed Flexible Buffer Structure. Shock and Vibration, 2019 is available at https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7934696en_US
dc.titleFull-scale impact test and numerical simulation of a new-type resilient rock-shed flexible buffer structureen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume2019en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2019/7934696en_US
dcterms.abstractRock sheds have been widely used to protect against rockfall. Traditionally, a cushion layer is placed on the top of a rock shed to reduce the impact force and dissipate energy. However, heavy cushion layers lead to high dead loads and increased construction costs. This paper discusses the concept of an impact-resilient flexible buffer structure. On the basis of that concept, it also proposes a buffer structure mainly composed of springs, ring nets, spring rods, and support ropes, which can be used to replace the traditional cushion layer on a shed for rockfall protection. Full-scale impact tests were conducted to study the impact-resilient characteristic of the structure combined with numerical simulation. The dynamic responses of the buffer structure, including force, deformation, and energy dissipation, were analysed in depth. Finally, parametric numerical simulations of 33 models were conducted; the spring stiffness of these models ranged from 300 kN/m to 1500 kN/m; the impact energy ranged from 100 kJ to 2000 kJ. Moreover, simple approaches for estimating the impact force and braking distance of the buffer structure were proposed and verified using measured data obtained from the impact test.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShock and vibration, 2019, v. 2019, 7934696-
dcterms.isPartOfShock and vibration-
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000473677400001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066085937-
dc.identifier.eissn1875-9203en_US
dc.identifier.artn7934696en_US
dc.description.validate201908 bcma-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yu_Full-scale_impact_test.pdf7.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

114
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

101
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.