Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/79160
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorTang, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhou, Den_US
dc.creatorChan, FTSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-30T03:01:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-30T03:01:41Z-
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/79160-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2018 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only.en_US
dc.rightsPersonal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.en_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of publisher.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Y. Tang, D. Zhou and F. T. S. Chan, "AMWRPN: Ambiguity Measure Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis," in IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 27103-27110, 2018 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2836139en_US
dc.subjectAmbiguity measureen_US
dc.subjectDempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST)en_US
dc.subjectFailure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)en_US
dc.subjectRisk priority number (RPN)en_US
dc.titleAMWRPN : ambiguity measure weighted risk priority number model for failure mode and effects analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage27103en_US
dc.identifier.epage27110en_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2836139en_US
dcterms.abstractThe relative importance of each risk factor in failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) should be addressed properly. Intuitively, in the assessments coming from the FEMA experts, there exists a potential judgement on which risk factor has a higher weight for the FMEA item. Based on this cognition and perspective, a new ambiguity measure weighted risk priority number (AMWRPN) for FMEA is proposed. AMWRPN takes into consideration of the relative weight of different risk factors by measuring the ambiguity degree of the experts' assessments. If the assessment of an expert has a certain belief on the judgement, then the relative importance of the corresponding risk factor will be higher than the uncertain one; and vice versa. The ambiguity measure (AM) in the framework of the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST) has been used to construct the exponential weight of each risk factor in AMWRPN. In comparison with the weight factor basing on fuzzy sets theory or other theories in the DST framework, the AM-based weight factor for uncertainty measure of the subjective assessment ensures the internal coordination of the proposed method. An application of the proposed method in aircraft turbine rotor blade verifies the effectiveness of the new risk priority number model.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIEEE access, 2018, v. 6, p. 27103-27110en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIEEE accessen_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85046782014-
dc.description.validate201810 bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tang_AMWRPN_Ambiguity_Measure.pdf2.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

117
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

66
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

34
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

34
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.