Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/79060
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service : a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke
Authors: Huang, YH 
Lai, WP 
Qian, QY 
Hu, XL 
Tam, EWC 
Zheng, YP 
Issue Date: 2018
Source: BioMedical engineering online, 2018, v. 17, 91
Abstract: Background: Rehabilitation robots can provide intensive physical training after stroke. However, variations of the rehabilitation effects in translation from well-controlled research studies to clinical services have not been well evaluated yet.This study aims to compare the rehabilitation effects of the upper limb training by an electromyography (EMG)-driven robotic hand achieved in a well-controlled research environment and in a practical clinical service.
Methods: It was a non-randomized controlled trial, and thirty-two participants with chronic stroke were recruited either in the clinical service (n = 16, clinic group), or in the research setting (n = 16, lab group). Each participant received 20-session EMG-driven robotic hand assisted upper limb training. The training frequency (4 sessions/week) and the pace in a session were fixed for the lab group, while they were flexible (1-3 sessions/week) and adaptive for the clinic group. The training effects were evaluated before and after the treatment with clinical scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
Results: Significant improvements in the FMA full score, shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand (P < 0.001), ARAT (P < 0.001), and MAS elbow (P < 0.05) were observed after the training for both groups. Significant improvements in the FIM (P < 0.05), MAS wrist (P < 0.001) and MAS hand (P < 0.05) were only obtained after the training in the clinic group. Compared with the lab group, higher FIM improvement in the clinic group was observed (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The functional improvements after the robotic hand training in the clinical service were comparable to the effectiveness achieved in the research setting, through flexible training schedules even with a lower training frequency every week. Higher independence in the daily living and a more effective release in muscle tones were achieved in the clinic group than the lab group.
Keywords: Stroke
Upper limb
Rehabilitation
Robot
Clinical service
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BioMedical engineering online 
EISSN: 1475-925X
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0516-2
Rights: © The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
The following publication Huang, Y., Lai, W.P., Qian, Q. et al. Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service: a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke. BioMed Eng OnLine 17, 91 (2018) is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0516-2.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12938-018-0516-2.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

116
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

27
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.