Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/79060
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorHuang, YHen_US
dc.creatorLai, WPen_US
dc.creatorQian, QYen_US
dc.creatorHu, XLen_US
dc.creatorTam, EWCen_US
dc.creatorZheng, YPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-26T01:22:17Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-26T01:22:17Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/79060-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Huang, Y., Lai, W.P., Qian, Q. et al. Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service: a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke. BioMed Eng OnLine 17, 91 (2018) is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0516-2.en_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectUpper limben_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectRoboten_US
dc.subjectClinical serviceen_US
dc.titleTranslation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service : a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic strokeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12938-018-0516-2en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Rehabilitation robots can provide intensive physical training after stroke. However, variations of the rehabilitation effects in translation from well-controlled research studies to clinical services have not been well evaluated yet.This study aims to compare the rehabilitation effects of the upper limb training by an electromyography (EMG)-driven robotic hand achieved in a well-controlled research environment and in a practical clinical service.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: It was a non-randomized controlled trial, and thirty-two participants with chronic stroke were recruited either in the clinical service (n = 16, clinic group), or in the research setting (n = 16, lab group). Each participant received 20-session EMG-driven robotic hand assisted upper limb training. The training frequency (4 sessions/week) and the pace in a session were fixed for the lab group, while they were flexible (1-3 sessions/week) and adaptive for the clinic group. The training effects were evaluated before and after the treatment with clinical scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Significant improvements in the FMA full score, shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand (P < 0.001), ARAT (P < 0.001), and MAS elbow (P < 0.05) were observed after the training for both groups. Significant improvements in the FIM (P < 0.05), MAS wrist (P < 0.001) and MAS hand (P < 0.05) were only obtained after the training in the clinic group. Compared with the lab group, higher FIM improvement in the clinic group was observed (P < 0.05).en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The functional improvements after the robotic hand training in the clinical service were comparable to the effectiveness achieved in the research setting, through flexible training schedules even with a lower training frequency every week. Higher independence in the daily living and a more effective release in muscle tones were achieved in the clinic group than the lab group.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBioMedical engineering online, 2018, v. 17, 91en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBioMedical engineering onlineen_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000436642000001-
dc.identifier.pmid29941043-
dc.identifier.eissn1475-925Xen_US
dc.identifier.artn91en_US
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017003051-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalen_US
dc.description.validate201810 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberBME-0257-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPolyU Central Funden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS15482495-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12938-018-0516-2.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

116
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

27
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

26
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.