Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6754
| Title: | Comparisons between Modal-Parameter-Based and Flexibility-Based Damage Identification Methods | Authors: | Wang, XJ Zhou, XQ Xia, Y Weng, S |
Issue Date: | Sep-2013 | Source: | Advances in structural engineering, Sept. 2013, v. 16, no. 9, p. 1611-1620 | Abstract: | Modal parameters and modal flexibility obtained from the modal experiment have been used for damage identification in frequency domain. These two methods are compared in this paper numerically and experimentally. The optimization objective function of the former method is a weighted function of the frequency and mode shape residues, in which different weights can be assigned to the frequencies and mode shapes so that their degrees of accuracy can be taken into account. The optimization objective function of the latter method is the modal flexibility residue. Based on the same modal data, the two methods are compared from different aspects, including the damage configurations and uncertainties in the modal data. Results show that using the modal parameters directly can detect damage more accurately and reliably than using the modal flexibility. | Keywords: | Damage identification Modal parameters Modal flexibility Uncertainty Statistical model updating |
Publisher: | Multi-Science | Journal: | Advances in structural engineering | ISSN: | 1369-4332 | EISSN: | 2048-4011 | DOI: | 10.1260/1369-4332.16.9.1611 | Rights: | © Multi-Science Publishing Posted with permission of the publisher. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASE13-16-09-1611_ISSE.pdf | 391.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
221
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Feb 9, 2026
Downloads
304
Citations as of Feb 9, 2026
SCOPUSTM
Citations
17
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of May 8, 2026
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
17
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



