Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6754
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorWang, XJ-
dc.creatorZhou, XQ-
dc.creatorXia, Y-
dc.creatorWeng, S-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:23:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:23:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn1369-4332-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/6754-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMulti-Scienceen_US
dc.rights© Multi-Science Publishingen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the publisher.en_US
dc.subjectDamage identificationen_US
dc.subjectModal parametersen_US
dc.subjectModal flexibilityen_US
dc.subjectUncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectStatistical model updatingen_US
dc.titleComparisons between Modal-Parameter-Based and Flexibility-Based Damage Identification Methodsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: Y. Xiaen_US
dc.identifier.spage1611-
dc.identifier.epage1620-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1260/1369-4332.16.9.1611-
dcterms.abstractModal parameters and modal flexibility obtained from the modal experiment have been used for damage identification in frequency domain. These two methods are compared in this paper numerically and experimentally. The optimization objective function of the former method is a weighted function of the frequency and mode shape residues, in which different weights can be assigned to the frequencies and mode shapes so that their degrees of accuracy can be taken into account. The optimization objective function of the latter method is the modal flexibility residue. Based on the same modal data, the two methods are compared from different aspects, including the damage configurations and uncertainties in the modal data. Results show that using the modal parameters directly can detect damage more accurately and reliably than using the modal flexibility.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAdvances in structural engineering, Sept. 2013, v. 16, no. 9, p. 1611-1620-
dcterms.isPartOfAdvances in structural engineering-
dcterms.issued2013-09-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000325601200013-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84885932302-
dc.identifier.eissn2048-4011-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr71185-
dc.description.ros2013-2014 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ASE13-16-09-1611_ISSE.pdf391.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

123
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

221
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.