Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/36265
Title: Should we adjust for a confounder if empirical and theoretical criteria yield contradictory results? A simulation study
Authors: Lee, PH 
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Source: Scientific reports, 2014, v. 4, 6085 How to cite?
Journal: Scientific reports 
Abstract: Confounders can be identified by one of two main strategies: empirical or theoretical. Although confounder identification strategies that combine empirical and theoretical strategies have been proposed, the need for adjustment remains unclear if the empirical and theoretical criteria yield contradictory results due to random error. We simulated several scenarios to mimic either the presence or the absence of a confounding effect and tested the accuracy of the exposure-outcome association estimates with and without adjustment. Various criteria (significance criterion, Change-in-estimate(CIE) criterion with a 10% cutoff and with a simulated cutoff) were imposed, and a range of sample sizes were trialed. In the presence of a true confounding effect, unbiased estimates were obtained only by using the CIE criterion with a simulated cutoff. In the absence of a confounding effect, all criteria performed well regardless of adjustment. When the confounding factor was affected by both exposure and outcome, all criteria yielded accurate estimates without adjustment, but the adjusted estimates were biased. To conclude, theoretical confounders should be adjusted for regardless of the empirical evidence found. The adjustment for factors that do not have a confounding effect minimally effects. Potential confounders affected by both exposure and outcome should not be adjusted for.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/36265
ISSN: 2045-2322 (online)
DOI: 10.1038/srep06085
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jan 13, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Jan 15, 2017

Page view(s)

8
Last Week
0
Last month
Checked on Jan 15, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.