Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99876
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | en_US |
| dc.creator | Chan, DWM | en_US |
| dc.creator | Olawumi, TO | en_US |
| dc.creator | Saka, AB | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ekundayo, D | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-24T08:31:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-24T08:31:49Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1562-3599 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99876 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Chan, D. W. M., Olawumi, T. O., Saka, A. B., & Ekundayo, D. (2022). Comparative analysis of the barriers to smart sustainable practices adoption in the construction industry between Hong Kong and Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(14), 1499–1509 is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2108973. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Barrier | en_US |
| dc.subject | BIM | en_US |
| dc.subject | Construction industry | en_US |
| dc.subject | Digital system | en_US |
| dc.subject | Predictive tool | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sustainability practices | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fuzzy synthetic evaluation | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparative analysis of the barriers to smart sustainable practices adoption in the construction industry between Hong Kong and Nigeria | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1499 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1509 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 24 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 14 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/15623599.2022.2108973 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The deployment of digital systems has facilitated process improvement in building construction, including for green practices implementation. However, it has encountered several challenges that have limited its use and hindered the diffusion of sustainable practices. Hence, this study aims to identify and assess the major barriers to smart-sustainable practices (SSP) adoption and evaluate its likely impact. A quantitative research method using empirical questionnaire surveys to solicit stakeholders' perceptions in Hong Kong and Nigeria to understand whether there is a commonality in the identified barriers between the two contexts. The collated data were analysed using descriptive statistics such as mean and inferential statistics (factor analysis), while fuzzy synthetic evaluation was used to develop the predictive models. Using non-probability sampling techniques, 97 and 69 responses were gotten from respondents in Hong Kong and Nigeria, respectively. The results revealed that workforce expertise, hesitancy to change from working practices, technical know-how, and inadequate understanding of the SSP process as the most critical barriers to SSP diffusion in Hong Kong and Nigeria. Also, impact evaluation models were developed as a predictive tool to evaluate and respond to the impact of these barriers. It is recommended for industry practitioners and policymakers to collaborate to create local context-based guidelines for facilitating SSP diffusion and monitor its implementation. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | International journal of construction management, 2024, v. 24, no. 14, p. 1499-1509 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | International journal of construction management | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85136192319 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2331-2327 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202307 bcch | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a2319 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 47499 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | RGC | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chan_Comparative_Analysis_Barriers.pdf | 1.55 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
138
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025
Downloads
50
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
14
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



