Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99876
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorChan, DWMen_US
dc.creatorOlawumi, TOen_US
dc.creatorSaka, ABen_US
dc.creatorEkundayo, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T08:31:49Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-24T08:31:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn1562-3599en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/99876-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chan, D. W. M., Olawumi, T. O., Saka, A. B., & Ekundayo, D. (2022). Comparative analysis of the barriers to smart sustainable practices adoption in the construction industry between Hong Kong and Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(14), 1499–1509 is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2108973.en_US
dc.subjectBarrieren_US
dc.subjectBIMen_US
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectDigital systemen_US
dc.subjectPredictive toolen_US
dc.subjectSustainability practicesen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy synthetic evaluationen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of the barriers to smart sustainable practices adoption in the construction industry between Hong Kong and Nigeriaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1499en_US
dc.identifier.epage1509en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue14en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15623599.2022.2108973en_US
dcterms.abstractThe deployment of digital systems has facilitated process improvement in building construction, including for green practices implementation. However, it has encountered several challenges that have limited its use and hindered the diffusion of sustainable practices. Hence, this study aims to identify and assess the major barriers to smart-sustainable practices (SSP) adoption and evaluate its likely impact. A quantitative research method using empirical questionnaire surveys to solicit stakeholders' perceptions in Hong Kong and Nigeria to understand whether there is a commonality in the identified barriers between the two contexts. The collated data were analysed using descriptive statistics such as mean and inferential statistics (factor analysis), while fuzzy synthetic evaluation was used to develop the predictive models. Using non-probability sampling techniques, 97 and 69 responses were gotten from respondents in Hong Kong and Nigeria, respectively. The results revealed that workforce expertise, hesitancy to change from working practices, technical know-how, and inadequate understanding of the SSP process as the most critical barriers to SSP diffusion in Hong Kong and Nigeria. Also, impact evaluation models were developed as a predictive tool to evaluate and respond to the impact of these barriers. It is recommended for industry practitioners and policymakers to collaborate to create local context-based guidelines for facilitating SSP diffusion and monitor its implementation.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of construction management, 2024, v. 24, no. 14, p. 1499-1509en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of construction managementen_US
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136192319-
dc.identifier.eissn2331-2327en_US
dc.description.validate202307 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2319-
dc.identifier.SubFormID47499-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chan_Comparative_Analysis_Barriers.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

138
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

Downloads

50
Citations as of Nov 10, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Citations as of Sep 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.