Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99788
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studiesen_US
dc.creatorMomenian, Men_US
dc.creatorPrivitera, AJen_US
dc.creatorWeekes, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T01:06:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-21T01:06:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn1366-7289en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/99788-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Momenian, M., Privitera, A. J., & Weekes, B. (2023). Nouns are not always processed faster than verbs in bilingual speakers: effects of language distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728923000408.en_US
dc.subjectBilingual experienceen_US
dc.subjectCantoneseen_US
dc.subjectGrammatical classen_US
dc.subjectMandarinen_US
dc.subjectNounen_US
dc.subjectVerben_US
dc.titleNouns are not always processed faster than verbs in bilingual speakers : effects of language distanceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage75en_US
dc.identifier.epage83en_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1366728923000408en_US
dcterms.abstractThe purpose of the current report is to study the effects of language distance on noun and verb processing in bilingual speakers. We recruited two groups of bilingual speakers: one group spoke two typologically distant languages (Cantonese and English) and the other group spoke two typologically similar languages (Mandarin and Cantonese). Participants named object and action pictures in their first language. We controlled psycholinguistic properties of words such as frequency, AoA, imageability, name agreement, visual complexity, familiarity, and participants’ bilingual language experiences. Our findings revealed a significant role for language distance. We observed a difference between noun and verb processing in the similar language pair (Mandarin–Cantonese) due to interference induced by language similarity. However, in the distant language pair (Cantonese–English), the difference disappeared because of the lack of cross-language interference. Our findings support that current and future models of bilingual language processing should take into account the effects of language distance.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBilingualism, Jan. 2024, v. 27, no. 1, p. 75-83en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBilingualismen_US
dcterms.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-1841en_US
dc.description.validate202307 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2281, a2677-
dc.identifier.SubFormID47318, 48049-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TACUP (2023)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
dc.relation.rdatahttps://osf.io/r7knb/en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Momenian_Nouns_Are_Not.pdf229.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

124
Last Week
8
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

89
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.