Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99538
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics | en_US |
| dc.creator | Zhen, Z | en_US |
| dc.creator | Chen, S | en_US |
| dc.creator | Yin, T | en_US |
| dc.creator | Gastellu-Etchegorry, JP | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-12T08:58:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-12T08:58:19Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99538 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Zhen, Zhijun; Chen, Shengbo; Yin, Tiangang; Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe(2023). Improving Crop Mapping by Using Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) Signatures with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 15(11), 2761 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112761. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Crop mapping | en_US |
| dc.subject | Google Earth Engine (GEE) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Kernel-driven model | en_US |
| dc.subject | Supervised classification | en_US |
| dc.title | Improving crop mapping by using Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) signatures with google earth engine | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 11 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/rs15112761 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of using bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) signatures captured by multi-angle observation data to enhance land cover classification and retrieve vegetation architectures. Considering the diversity of crop architectures, we proposed that crop mapping precision may be enhanced by using BRDF signatures. We compared the accuracy of four supervised machine learning classifiers provided by the Google Earth Engine (GEE), namely random forest (RF), classification and regression trees (CART), support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB), using the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) nadir BRDF-adjusted reflectance data (MCD43A4 V6) and BRDF and albedo model parameter data (MCD43A1 V6) as input. Our results indicated that using BRDF signatures leads to a moderate improvement in classification results in most cases, compared to using reflectance data from a single nadir observation direction. Specifically, the overall validation accuracy increased by up to 4.9%, and the validation kappa coefficients increased by up to 0.092. Furthermore, the classifiers were ranked in order of accuracy, from highest to lowest: RF, CART, SVM, and NB. Our study contributes to the development of crop mapping and the application of multi-angle observation satellites. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Remote sensing, June 2023, v. 15, no. 11, 2761 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Remote sensing | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2023-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85161918829 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2072-4292 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.artn | 2761 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202307 bcww | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a2250 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 47219 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| remotesensing-15-02761-v2.pdf | 6.65 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
73
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
43
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
13
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
7
Citations as of Nov 14, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



