Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99511
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies | en_US |
| dc.creator | Yao, Y | en_US |
| dc.creator | Zhu, X | en_US |
| dc.creator | Zhu, S | en_US |
| dc.creator | Jiang, Y | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-12T00:56:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-12T00:56:40Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1075-2935 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99511 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Yao, Y., Zhu, X., Zhu, S., & Jiang, Y. (2023). The impacts of self-efficacy on undergraduate students’ perceived task value and task performance of L1 Chinese integrated writing: A mixed-method research. Assessing Writing, 55, 100687 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100687. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Chinese-as-a-first-language | en_US |
| dc.subject | Integrated writing | en_US |
| dc.subject | Self-efficacy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Task value | en_US |
| dc.title | The impacts of self-efficacy on undergraduate students’ perceived task value and task performance of L1 Chinese integrated writing : a mixed-method research | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 55 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.asw.2022.100687 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | While integrated writing (IW) has received extensive research attention, students’ self-efficacy beliefs in IW learning remain under explored, particularly in first-language (L1) IW instruction. With a sample of 239 first-year undergraduate students at a Chinese university, this study investigated students’ L1 Chinese IW self-efficacy beliefs, as well as their impacts on perceived task value and IW performance. Exploratory factor analyses identified five sub-dimensions of IW self-efficacy: ideation, conventions, source use, negative emotion control, and concentration. Notably, source use was a unique sub-dimension for IW self-efficacy. Negative emotion control and concentration were separated from the self-regulation construct in Bruning et al. (2013). Latent profile analysis categorized students into three groups based on their diverse levels of IW self-efficacy: moderate-, moderate-high-, and high-efficacious students. Students’ IW self-efficacy levels had a positive association with their perceived IW task value; however, the relationship between self-efficacy and IW performance was insignificant. Nine representative students, three from each group, were invited for the follow-up semi-structured interviews, and their responses provided complementary information for the quantitative analyses results. Pedagogical suggestions on L1 IW instruction were provided based on the findings. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Assessing writing, Jan. 2023, v. 55, 100687 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Assessing writing | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2023-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85145319085 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-5916 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.artn | 100687 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202307 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a2230 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 47132 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yao_Impacts_Self-Efficacy_Undergraduate.pdf | Pre-Published version | 932.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
58
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
17
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
Citations as of Jan 30, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



