Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99209
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies | en_US |
| dc.creator | Sun, Q | en_US |
| dc.creator | Chen, L | en_US |
| dc.creator | Chou, MC | en_US |
| dc.creator | Meng, Q | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-03T06:16:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-03T06:16:17Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1059-1478 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99209 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2022 Production and Operations Management Society. | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sun, Q., Chen, L., Chou, M. C., & Meng, Q. (2023). Mitigating the financial risk behind emission cap compliance: A case in maritime transportation. Production and Operations Management, 32(1), 283-300, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13837. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Emission cap | en_US |
| dc.subject | Optimization under uncertainty | en_US |
| dc.subject | Risk and ambiguity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Shipping finance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sustainable operations | en_US |
| dc.title | Mitigating the financial risk behind emission cap compliance : a case in maritime transportation | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 283 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 300 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 32 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/poms.13837 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | The enforcement of ever-stringent regulatory requirements capping emission limits is challenging the traditional operations of various transportation sectors. In maritime transportation, the recent regulation tightening fuel sulfur limits to 0.50%, known as the “IMO 2020,” has been enforced. There is a flurry of activities by ocean carriers to equip their vessels to comply with this regulation. Although the technical conditions are clear, investment decisions are hard to make due to inevitable uncertainties in the current transition period, especially on the impact of fuel prices in the long run. In this study, we consider an ocean carrier's technology investment decisions. Each compliance solution is subject to uncertain operating costs with a partially characterized probability distribution that may deviate from current expected norms. The carrier chooses a portfolio of compliance solutions for its entire fleet that would best adhere to two decision criteria characterized by a net present value (NPV) target in investment and a capacity utilization rate target in fleet deployment. To find optimal decisions that will perform well in the uncertain transition period, we introduce a tractable mathematical model, termed the ambiguous robustness optimization model, to minimize the financial riskiness index associated with the risk of expected NPV not meeting a specified target. We further propose a solution scheme through mixed-integer second-order cone programming approximation that can be efficiently solved by off-the-shelf solvers. We show that this decision support system performs well in numerical experiments constructed using real data on the Asia-North America West Coast shipping network. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Production and operations management, Jan. 2023, v. 32, no. 1, p. 283-300 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Production and operations management | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2023-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85139907598 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1937-5956 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202306 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a2137 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 46744 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | Singapore Maritime Institute; National University of Singapore Academic Research Fund | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun_Mitigating_Financial_Risk.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
5
Citations as of Jan 30, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



