Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/99017
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorQi, Jen_US
dc.creatorWang, Hen_US
dc.creatorZheng, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-08T01:09:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-08T01:09:13Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/99017-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Qi J, Wang H, Zheng J. Shore Power Deployment Problem—A Case Study of a Chinese Container Shipping Network. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6928 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928.en_US
dc.subjectContainer shipping networken_US
dc.subjectGovernment subsidyen_US
dc.subjectMaritime transportationen_US
dc.subjectShore power deployment problemen_US
dc.titleShore power deployment problem—a case study of a Chinese container shipping networken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su14116928en_US
dcterms.abstractShipping emissions, especially those in port areas, have become one of the main concerns of the maritime industry. Shore power has been recognized as a promising way to alleviate the problem. However, shore power has not been extensively adopted in China. Therefore, from the government’s point of view, this paper conducts a case study of the shore power deployment problem based on the real container shipping network of China, including the Port of Hong Kong. In addition to the basic case, we, also, conduct numerical experiments with different budgets, to analyze its influence on the optimal subsidy plan and cost–benefit analysis. The results give two useful managerial insights: (i) it might be unnecessary to spend a large amount of the budget on subsidization, and (ii) the subsidy expenditure needs to be considered together with the final bunker reduction, while creating the budget.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, June 2022, v. 14, no. 11, 6928en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainabilityen_US
dcterms.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132133600-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050en_US
dc.identifier.artn6928en_US
dc.description.validate202306 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2087-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46523-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sustainability-14-06928-v2.pdf942.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

64
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Citations as of Dec 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.