Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98788
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorYan, Ren_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T06:16:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-23T06:16:52Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98788-
dc.descriptionThe 24th International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, HKSTS 2019: Transport and Smart Cities, 14-16 December 2019, Hong Kongen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Society for Transportation Studies Limiteden_US
dc.rightsReprinted from Yan R. and Wang S. (2019) Evaluation of the influence of stricter sulphur limits within emission control area on port state control inspection. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, 14-16 December, Hong Kong, pp. 197-203, with permission from Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies.en_US
dc.subjectEmission control areas (ECAs)en_US
dc.subjectMann-Whitney U testen_US
dc.subjectPort state control (PSC) inspectionen_US
dc.subjectWilcoxon signed-rank testen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the influence of stricter sulphur limits within emission control area on port state control inspectionen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper aims to identify if the regulation of stricter sulphur limits of 0.1% m/m within the emission control areas has an influence on the port state control inspection. Inspection records of 18 months before and after 1 January 2015 of 5 ports within and 5 ports outside the emission control areas are selected respectively as the sample data. The average deficiency number in a PSC inspection, average age of the inspected ships, ECA related deficiency rate and detention rate are selected as the inspection indicators. Three significant differences are found: (ⅰ) Ships calling the ports outside ECAs are of elder age than the ships calling the ports within ECAs; (ⅱ) ECA related deficiency rate is higher in the ports within the ECAs while is lower outside ECAs; (ⅲ) Ship detention rate in the ports outside ECAs is higher than that within the ECAs.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPresented at The 24th International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, HKSTS 2019: Transport and Smart Cities, 14-16 December 2019, Hong Kong (Poster presentation)en_US
dcterms.issued2019-12-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies [HKSTS International Conference]en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaOther Versionen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0165-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24586409-
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yan_Evaluation_Influence_Stricter.pdf318.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Other Version
Show simple item record

Page views

53
Citations as of May 5, 2024

Downloads

25
Citations as of May 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.