Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98783
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorXu, Jen_US
dc.creatorFu, Sen_US
dc.creatorChao, CYHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T06:14:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-23T06:14:37Z-
dc.identifier.issn1420-326Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98783-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Jingcui Xu, Sauchung Fu and Christopher Y. H. Chao, Performance of airflow distance from personalized ventilation on personal exposure to airborne droplets from different orientations, Indoor and Built Environment (Volume 30, Issue 10) pp. 1591-1874. Copyright © 2021 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20951245.en_US
dc.subjectPersonalized ventilationen_US
dc.subjectOrientationsen_US
dc.subjectPersonal exposureen_US
dc.subjectAirborne dropletsen_US
dc.subjectInhalation zoneen_US
dc.subjectAirflow distanceen_US
dc.titlePerformance of airflow distance from personalized ventilation on personal exposure to airborne droplets from different orientationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1643en_US
dc.identifier.epage1653en_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1420326X20951245en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study investigated the effect of airflow distance from a personalized ventilation (PV) system on the personal exposure of a PV user to exhaled droplets from different orientations. Constant and dynamic airflow from the PV system was studied. A PV system was designed to produce both constant and dynamic airflows with different periods. Thermal manikins were used to simulate a healthy person (HP), also the PV user, influenced by a respiratory activity from an infected person (IP) at different orientations. Results show that, with a short distance of 0.2 m between the PV and the HP, both constant and dynamic PV flow can effectively protect the HP at all orientations considered; with a longer distance of 0.5 m between the PV and the HP, at some orientations, neither constant PV flow nor dynamic PV flow could protect the HP from the IP under our testing conditions. PV is a potential method to prevent disease transmission. However, a proper design is essential, and the relative position of the PV terminal, the IP and the HP and the distance of the PV from the HP are important factors to be considered so as to achieve the best performance.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIndoor and built environment, Dec. 2021, v. 30, no. 10, p. 1643-1653en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIndoor and built environmenten_US
dcterms.issued2021-12-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000580931700001-
dc.identifier.eissn1423-0070en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2042 [non PolyU]-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46348-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chao_Performance_Airflow_Distance.pdfPre-Published version2.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

71
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

80
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Citations as of Jun 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.