Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98781
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Applied Social Sciences | en_US |
| dc.creator | Au, A | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-22T02:28:01Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-22T02:28:01Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98781 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
| dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2023 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution ofthe work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Au, A. (2023). A Theoretical Examination of Homophily Beyond Focus Theory: Causes, Consequences, and New Directions. SAGE Open, 13(2) is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231173915. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Homophily | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social networks | en_US |
| dc.subject | Focus theory | en_US |
| dc.subject | Network structure | en_US |
| dc.subject | Decision science | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social psychology | en_US |
| dc.title | A theoretical examination of homophily beyond focus theory : causes, consequences, and new directions | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 13 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/21582440231173915 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Scott Feld’s focus theory stimulated one of the most important traditions in the study of the concept of homophily in connection to individual action and network behavior across sociology and organizational studies. This article uses Feld’s focus theory as a starting point of reference to examine the major theoretical developments and empirical applications of homophily since his pioneering work. First, this article interrogates the causes of homophily by examining structured versus social psychological preference for similarity as two prominent explanatory mechanisms for homophily. Second, this article scopes out the consequences of homophily by examining the advantages and disadvantages of homophily for individual action and network behavior. Finally, building on the previous sections, this article proposes new areas for the study of homophily: deleterious psychosocial consequences of homophily, the role of multiplexity in causing homophily, and the disaggregation of homophily in general into different, nuanced (potentially interacting) types of homophily. This article thus contributes to the literature by offering a critical juncture to examine the key arguments that have guided the study of homophily since Feld’s focus theory and an important launching point for future research on the concept of homophily and its applications. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | SAGE open, Apr.-June 2023, v. 13, no. 2 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | SAGE open | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2023-05-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2158-2440 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202305 bcww | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a2040 | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 46345 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
| dc.description.fundingText | Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21582440231173915.pdf | 215.4 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
102
Last Week
5
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025
Downloads
80
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



