Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98781
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorAu, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-22T02:28:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-22T02:28:01Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98781-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution ofthe work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Au, A. (2023). A Theoretical Examination of Homophily Beyond Focus Theory: Causes, Consequences, and New Directions. SAGE Open, 13(2) is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231173915.en_US
dc.subjectHomophilyen_US
dc.subjectSocial networksen_US
dc.subjectFocus theoryen_US
dc.subjectNetwork structureen_US
dc.subjectDecision scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial psychologyen_US
dc.titleA theoretical examination of homophily beyond focus theory : causes, consequences, and new directionsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/21582440231173915en_US
dcterms.abstractScott Feld’s focus theory stimulated one of the most important traditions in the study of the concept of homophily in connection to individual action and network behavior across sociology and organizational studies. This article uses Feld’s focus theory as a starting point of reference to examine the major theoretical developments and empirical applications of homophily since his pioneering work. First, this article interrogates the causes of homophily by examining structured versus social psychological preference for similarity as two prominent explanatory mechanisms for homophily. Second, this article scopes out the consequences of homophily by examining the advantages and disadvantages of homophily for individual action and network behavior. Finally, building on the previous sections, this article proposes new areas for the study of homophily: deleterious psychosocial consequences of homophily, the role of multiplexity in causing homophily, and the disaggregation of homophily in general into different, nuanced (potentially interacting) types of homophily. This article thus contributes to the literature by offering a critical juncture to examine the key arguments that have guided the study of homophily since Feld’s focus theory and an important launching point for future research on the concept of homophily and its applications.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSAGE open, Apr.-June 2023, v. 13, no. 2en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSAGE openen_US
dcterms.issued2023-05-20-
dc.identifier.eissn2158-2440en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera2040-
dc.identifier.SubFormID46345-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
21582440231173915.pdf215.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

102
Last Week
5
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

80
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.