Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98649
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Mathematicsen_US
dc.creatorHu, BQen_US
dc.creatorWong, Hen_US
dc.creatorYiu, KFCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-10T02:00:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-10T02:00:52Z-
dc.identifier.issn0888-613Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98649-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hu, B. Q., Wong, H., & Yiu, K. F. C. (2017). On two novel types of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 82, 285-306 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.12.007.en_US
dc.subjectPartially ordered setsen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy setsen_US
dc.subjectInterval-valued fuzzy setsen_US
dc.subjectRough setsen_US
dc.subjectThree-way decision spacesen_US
dc.subjectThree-way decisionsen_US
dc.titleOn two novel types of three-way decisions in three-way decision spacesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage285en_US
dc.identifier.epage306en_US
dc.identifier.volume82en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijar.2016.12.007en_US
dcterms.abstractIn order to explore a unified theory of three-way decisions proposed by Yao, Hu introduced three-way decision spaces through an axiomatic method, established the corresponding three-way decisions, and proposed two open problems on the changes of decision parameters in definition of three-way decisions. For answering these two questions, this paper firstly discusses the parameter changes in the assumptions from 0≤β<α≤1 to 0≤β≤α≤1 and inequality E(A)(x)≤β in the rejection region is replaced by E(A)(x)<β. Under the circumstance, this paper introduces new type of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces and discusses properties of the three-way decisions, lower and upper approximations induced by three-way decisions, aggregation three-way decisions over multiple three-way decision spaces and dynamic three-way decisions on three-way decision spaces. Then this paper discusses another question on refusal decision region when the uncertain region is defined by using inequality β<E(A)(x)<α and gives one example to illustrate the similarity and difference among these three-way decisions based on three-way decision spaces.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of approximate reasoning, Mar. 2017, v. 82, p. 285-306en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of approximate reasoningen_US
dcterms.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009203963-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4731en_US
dc.description.validate202305 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAMA-0503-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPolyUen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6714100-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wong_Two_Novel_Types.pdfPre-Published version1.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

53
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

49
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

53
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

49
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.