Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98356
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T01:05:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T01:05:00Z-
dc.identifier.issn0308-8839en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98356-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Maritime Policy & Management on 24 Oct 2016 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03088839.2016.1245879.en_US
dc.subjectDwell timeen_US
dc.subjectInventory costs of containersen_US
dc.subjectLiner shipping network designen_US
dc.subjectTransshipmenten_US
dc.subjectValue of transit timeen_US
dc.titleFormulating cargo inventory costs for liner shipping network designen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage62en_US
dc.identifier.epage80en_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2016.1245879en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examines how to incorporate the inventory costs of containerized cargoes into existing liner service planning models such that the designed networks could be improved while not causing extra modeling/computational burden. Two approaches are compared: (i) not considering the inventory costs at all and (ii) incorporating the inventory costs associated with onboard time and those related to transshipment by assuming a fixed connection time. The two models are compared with the ideal model capturing the exact inventory costs on a route choice problem and a capacity planning problem based on extensive randomly generated and practical numerical experiments. The results show that: first, ignoring the inventory costs in service planning models may lead to network design with much higher costs (poor network design decisions); second, in service planning models assuming weekly frequency, the inventory costs associated with onboard time could be formulated exactly, and those related to the connection time of weekly services could be approximated by assuming fixed connection time of 3.5 days for ports with 1 day’s minimum connection time and 4.5 days for ports with 2 days’ minimum connection time.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMaritime policy and management, 2017, v. 44, no. 1, p. 62-80en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMaritime policy and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84992170402-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5254en_US
dc.description.validate202304 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0431-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6688454-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Formulating_Cargo_Inventory.pdfPre-Published version1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

50
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

60
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.