Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98348
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Len_US
dc.creatorPan, Xen_US
dc.creatorJing, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T01:04:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T01:04:58Z-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98348-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2022 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributorsen_US
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Business Law following peer review. The definitive published version Zhu, L., Pan, X., Jing, Z. (2017). Marine insurance warranty: comparing common and civil law approaches and their implications for the reform of Chinese law. Journal of Business Law, 2017(3), 218-236 is available online on Westlaw UK (http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/).en_US
dc.rightsThis manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectBreach of warrantyen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectCivil lawen_US
dc.subjectCommon lawen_US
dc.subjectComparative lawen_US
dc.subjectMarine insuranceen_US
dc.titleMarine insurance warranty : comparing common and civil law approaches and their implications for the reform of Chinese lawen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage218en_US
dc.identifier.epage236en_US
dc.identifier.volume2017en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dcterms.abstractFor risk management, "warranty" provisions in common law serve to define the risk insured, whereas civil law countries adopt an "alteration of risk" doctrine. The term "warranty" under Chinese marine insurance law is derived from English law, whereas in its general insurance law China at the same time also adopts an "alteration of risk" doctrine to control risk. The need for a reform of insurance warranty law has prompted much scholarly debate. Following a thorough discussion of the status quo of warranty law in China, this article further explores the reformed warranty law under the Insurance Act 2015 in England, together with the general "alteration of risk" doctrine in civil law countries. It is argued that blindly importing relevant articles from the Insurance Act 2015 is not a feasible solution, as this will not only create more disputes, but will also create inconsistency with other laws. The article concludes by suggesting that maybe adopting the "alteration of risk" doctrine is a better way to replace the current warranty law under Chinese marine insurance law.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of business law, 2017, v. 2017, no. 3, p. 218-236en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of business lawen_US
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.description.validate202304 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0411-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24479438-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhu_Marine_Insurance_Warranty.pdfPre-Published version939.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

86
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

39
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.