Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98322
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorKou, Yen_US
dc.creatorLuo, Men_US
dc.creatorZhao, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T01:04:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T01:04:47Z-
dc.identifier.issn0308-8839en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98322-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Maritime Policy & Management on 22 Dec 2017 (published online), available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03088839.2017.1418091en_US
dc.subjectShipping cycleen_US
dc.subjectShipping freight ratesen_US
dc.subjectStationarityen_US
dc.subjectStructural changeen_US
dc.titleExamining the theoretical–empirical inconsistency on stationarity of shipping freight rateen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage145en_US
dc.identifier.epage158en_US
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03088839.2017.1418091en_US
dcterms.abstractAs market price, shipping freight rates should in theory be stationary, but most empirical tests have found them to be non-stationary. To examine the causes of this theoretical–empirical inconsistency, we investigate the sensitivities of the stationarity of shipping freight rates from two perspectives: sample length and sample window. Longer samples are found not sufficient to make them stationary. Instead, sample windows separated by structural breaks are tested as stationary. Moreover, freight rates are found to have entered into a new phase since the 2008 financial crisis. This study contributes to the literature on the stationarity of shipping freight rates by providing an explanation for the theoretical–empirical inconsistency.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMaritime policy and management, 2018, v. 45, no. 2, p. 145-158en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMaritime policy and managementen_US
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85038842649-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5254en_US
dc.description.validate202304 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0334-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of China; Scientific Research Staring Fund for Young Teachersen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6807626-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Luo_Examining_Theoretical–Empirical_Inconsistency.pdfPre-Published version1.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

63
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

50
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.