Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98300
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies | en_US |
| dc.creator | Yang, D | en_US |
| dc.creator | Jiang, L | en_US |
| dc.creator | Ng, AKY | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-27T01:04:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-27T01:04:38Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0965-8564 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98300 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Pergamon Press | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. | en_US |
| dc.rights | The following publication Yang, D., Jiang, L., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2018). One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 190-204 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Belt and Road (B&R) initiative | en_US |
| dc.subject | Eurasian trade corridor | en_US |
| dc.subject | Multi-criteria decision analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Scenario analysis | en_US |
| dc.title | One Belt one Road, but several routes : a case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 190 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 204 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 117 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | Under the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative, two new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe have been built. One is the China-Europe Sea-Land Express Line (CESEL) and the other is the New Eurasian Land Bridge (NELB). This paper aims to understand the attitude of relevant stakeholders towards the performance of the Traditional Sea-Land Line (TSLL) alongside the two emerging container routes under the B&R initiative. To achieve this objective, we first of all built a performance evaluation system to understand the relative performance of these trade routes. A questionnaire survey was carried out to reveal the differing views on route performance, and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) was then used to examine and interpret the survey data. Secondly, by dividing the interviewees into two groups, we examined whether the government's development priorities are at variance with the preferences of industry practitioners. Thirdly, we explored the reasons for the variance by conducting an intensive interview with ten key stakeholders and then explain the findings from the perspective of institutional theories. Finally, we addressed the uncertainty and dynamics of route development under three different scenarios. Several managerial implications are proposed on the basis of our findings. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Transportation research. Part A. Policy and practice, Nov. 2018, v. 117, p. 190-204 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Transportation research. Part A. Policy and practice | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2018-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85052225158 | - |
| dc.description.validate | 202304 bckw | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | LMS-0274 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.identifier.OPUS | 24391394 | - |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang_One_Belt_One.pdf | Pre-Published version | 946.11 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
175
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
69
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
44
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



