Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98300
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorYang, Den_US
dc.creatorJiang, Len_US
dc.creatorNg, AKYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T01:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T01:04:38Z-
dc.identifier.issn0965-8564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98300-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Yang, D., Jiang, L., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2018). One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 190-204 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001.en_US
dc.subjectBelt and Road (B&R) initiativeen_US
dc.subjectEurasian trade corridoren_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision analysisen_US
dc.subjectScenario analysisen_US
dc.titleOne Belt one Road, but several routes : a case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage190en_US
dc.identifier.epage204en_US
dc.identifier.volume117en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.001en_US
dcterms.abstractUnder the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative, two new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe have been built. One is the China-Europe Sea-Land Express Line (CESEL) and the other is the New Eurasian Land Bridge (NELB). This paper aims to understand the attitude of relevant stakeholders towards the performance of the Traditional Sea-Land Line (TSLL) alongside the two emerging container routes under the B&R initiative. To achieve this objective, we first of all built a performance evaluation system to understand the relative performance of these trade routes. A questionnaire survey was carried out to reveal the differing views on route performance, and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) was then used to examine and interpret the survey data. Secondly, by dividing the interviewees into two groups, we examined whether the government's development priorities are at variance with the preferences of industry practitioners. Thirdly, we explored the reasons for the variance by conducting an intensive interview with ten key stakeholders and then explain the findings from the perspective of institutional theories. Finally, we addressed the uncertainty and dynamics of route development under three different scenarios. Several managerial implications are proposed on the basis of our findings.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part A. Policy and practice, Nov. 2018, v. 117, p. 190-204en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part A. Policy and practiceen_US
dcterms.issued2018-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052225158-
dc.description.validate202304 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0274-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS24391394-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yang_One_Belt_One.pdfPre-Published version946.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

175
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

69
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

44
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.