Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98262
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.creatorYang, Hen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T01:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T01:04:21Z-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98262-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2022 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributorsen_US
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Business Law following peer review. The definitive published version Yang, H., & Zhu, L. (2022). Marine Terminal Operator's Liability for Misdelivery: Chinese Law and Judicial Practice. Journal of business law, 2022(1), 43-65 is available online on Westlaw UK (http://legalresearch.westlaw.co.uk/).en_US
dc.rightsThis manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.titleMarine terminal operator's liability for misdelivery : Chinese law and judicial practiceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage43en_US
dc.identifier.epage65en_US
dc.identifier.volume2022en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dcterms.abstractDuring the entire process of the carriage of goods by sea, the marine terminal operator (MTO) plays a crucial role, since it provides ancillary services, such as loading, discharging and warehousing for clients before and after the voyage. Misdelivery often occurs when an MTO has the obligation to store and deliver the goods against certain documents but fails to do so - and there is actually an increasing number of disputes in this area. When misdelivery occurs, the MTO can be claimed against for liability, either under the contract or in tort. This article aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the adequacy of the existing legal rules in regulating MTOs and their contractual and tort liabilities for misdelivery. The findings in this article show that the existing rules are fragmented, vague and uncertain in several aspects. It is suggested that a set of rules specifically and effectively addressing different aspects relating to the MTO and its delivery obligations are necessary in Chinese law, and a number of recommendations are accordingly provided in this article.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of business law, 2022, v. 2022, no. 1, p. 43-65en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of business lawen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.description.validate202304 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberLMS-0158, a0799-n05, 1678en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yang_Marine_Terminal_Operators.pdfPre-Published version1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

72
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

35
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.