Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98186
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Food Science and Nutritionen_US
dc.creatorHui, LLen_US
dc.creatorNelson, EASen_US
dc.creatorDeng, HBen_US
dc.creatorLeung, TYen_US
dc.creatorHo, CHen_US
dc.creatorChong, JSCen_US
dc.creatorFung, GPGen_US
dc.creatorHui, Jen_US
dc.creatorLam, HSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T05:55:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-17T05:55:51Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98186-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Hui, L. L., Nelson, E. A. S., Deng, H. B., Leung, T. Y., Ho, C. H., Chong, J. S. C., . . . Lam, H. S. (2022). The view of Hong Kong parents on secondary use of dried blood spots in newborn screening program. BMC Medical Ethics, 23, 105 is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00839-zen_US
dc.subjectNewborn screeningen_US
dc.subjectResidual dried blood spotsen_US
dc.subjectBiobankingen_US
dc.subjectParental autonomyen_US
dc.subjectInformed consenten_US
dc.subjectData privacyen_US
dc.titleThe view of Hong Kong parents on secondary use of dried blood spots in newborn screening programen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-022-00839-zen_US
dcterms.abstractBackground Residual dried blood spots (rDBS) from newborn screening programmes represent a valuable resource for medical research, from basic sciences, through clinical to public health. In Hong Kong, there is no legislation for biobanking. Parents’ view on the retention and use of residual newborn blood samples could be cultural-specific and is important to consider for biobanking of rDBS.en_US
dcterms.abstractObjective To study the views and concerns on long-term storage and secondary use of rDBS from newborn screening programmes among Hong Kong Chinese parents.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods A mixed-method approach was used to study the views and concerns on long-term storage and secondary use of rDBS from newborn screening programmes among Hong Kong Chinese parents of children 0–3 years or expecting parents through focus groups (8 groups; 33 participants) and a survey (n = 1012, 85% mothers) designed with insights obtained from the focus groups. We used framework analysis to summarise the themes as supportive factors, concerns and critical arguments for retention and secondary use of rDBS from focus group discussion. We used multiple logistic regression to assess factors associated with support for retention and secondary use of rDBS in the survey.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults Both in focus groups and survey, majority of parents were not aware of the potential secondary use of rDBS. Overall secondary use of rDBS in medical research was well accepted by a large proportion of Hong Kong parents, even if all potential future research could not be specified in a broad consent. However parents were concerned about potential risks of biobanking rDBS including leaking of data and mis-use of genetic information. Parents wanted to be asked for permission before rDBS are stored and mainly did not accept an “opt-out” approach. The survey showed that parents born in mainland China, compared to Hong Kong born parents, had lower awareness of newborn screening but higher support in biobanking rDBS. Higher education was associated with support in rDBS biobanking only among fathers.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion Long-term storage and secondary use of rDBS from newborn screening for biomedical research and a broad consent for biobanking of rDBS are generally acceptable to Hong Kong parents given their autonomy is respected and their privacy is protected, highlighting the importance of an accountable governance and a transparent access policy for rDBS biobanks.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBMC medical ethics, 2022, v. 23, 105en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBMC medical ethicsen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000877699300001-
dc.identifier.pmid36319979-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6939en_US
dc.identifier.artn105en_US
dc.description.validate202304 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Others-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPublic Policy Research Funding Scheme from Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Governmenten_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12910-022-00839-z.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

130
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

44
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.