Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98155
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorHo, Ven_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T08:28:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T08:28:19Z-
dc.identifier.issn1860-7330en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98155-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMouton De Gruyteren_US
dc.rights©2016 by De Gruyter Moutonen_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Ho, V. (2016). Discourse of persuasion: a preliminary study of the use of metadiscourse in policy documents. Text & Talk, 36(1), 1-21 is available at https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0001.en_US
dc.subjectDiscourseen_US
dc.subjectLogos/ethos/pathosen_US
dc.subjectMetadiscourseen_US
dc.subjectPersuasionen_US
dc.subjectPolicy reformsen_US
dc.titleDiscourse of persuasion : a preliminary study of the use of metadiscourse in policy documentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage21en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/text-2016-0001en_US
dcterms.abstractThe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government has proposed a number of reform initiatives in different policy areas since its establishment in 1997. This paper explores and discusses the HKSAR government's discursive attempt to persuade the people of Hong Kong to accept two education policy reforms it has proposed. Adopting a corpus-based approach and drawing upon the construct of metadiscourse as the method of inquiry in the study, the author found that the HKSAR government had appealed to logos, ethos, and pathos with metadiscourse in the policy reform discourse in actualizing its persuasive attempts. The present study represents a modest attempt to analyze the policy document genre from a metadiscursive perspective and to inform writers of the genre of the possible ways to textualize the three means of persuasion-logos, ethos, and pathos-who will then be more aware of the resources that they can use to enhance the persuasiveness of their writing.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationText and talk, Jan. 2016, v. 36, no. 1, p. 1-21en_US
dcterms.isPartOfText and talken_US
dcterms.issued2016-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84962527331-
dc.identifier.eissn1860-7349en_US
dc.description.validate202304 bcwwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberENGL-0219-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.identifier.OPUS6970723-
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1515_text-2016-0001.pdf1.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

79
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

65
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.