Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/98130
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorLopez-Ozieblo, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-12T08:28:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-12T08:28:08Z-
dc.identifier.issn1738-1460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/98130-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnglish Language Education Publishing (ELE)en_US
dc.rightsThis is a preprint of an article submitted for consideration in the Asian EFL Journal in 2018.-
dc.rightsThe following publication Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2018). Testing task difficulty evaluating parameters and identifying gestures as a valid indicator. The Asian EFL Journal, 20(6), 322-346 is available at https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal-editions/.-
dc.subjectGestures-
dc.subjectMultimodal tasks-
dc.subjectCognitive load-
dc.subjectSecond language acquisition (SLA)-
dc.subjectEvaluating parameters-
dc.titleTesting task difficulty evaluating parameters and identifying gestures as a valid indicatoren_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage322en_US
dc.identifier.epage346en_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dcterms.abstractIn second language acquisition, tasks based on various types of inputs are very popular. These inputs can be textual, aural or visual (or a combination of all three). Perceptions of task difficulty varies from student to student and assessing the complexity of the task can be a challenge to designers. This study investigates how ten Hong Kong participants, second language speakers of English, ranked the difficulty of three tasks based on different input modalities –textual, aural and visual. It also compares participants’ rankings to those calculated through a number of parameters used to evaluate speakers’ speech performance (Skehan, 2009; Robinson, 2011). In addition, this study explores the validity of new parameters based on gestures. A meta-analysis of gesture studies confirms that gestures, movements of the hands and arms when speaking, are used by speakers to reduce cognitive load but also to help listeners understand the message (Hostetter, 2011). Different modality inputs might be imposing different cognitive loads, both in the processing of the information and in its transformation into speech/gesture. If there is a link between cognitive load and gesture, through studying gestures we might be able to find out more about the cognitive loads imposed by different modalities. Our hypothesis that there would be more gestures in the narrations of the more demanding tasks was confirmed by this study. This suggest that a gesture based parameter might be a good indicators of task difficulty.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAsian EFL journal, June 2018, v. 20, no. 6, p. 322-346en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAsian EFL journalen_US
dcterms.issued2018-06-
dc.description.validate202304 bcww-
dc.description.oaAuthor’s Original-
dc.identifier.FolderNumberENGL-0128, a1331-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44616-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthers-
dc.description.fundingTextPolyU-
dc.description.pubStatusPublished-
dc.identifier.OPUS21116849-
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AO)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lopez_Testing_Task_Difficulty.pdfPreprint Version467.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Author’s Original
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

59
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

22
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.